I think you're putting words where they did not exist.
Politicans always love to play with words so it makes us to think what comes next. When he starts to talk Iranians being victims of poison gas and that US is ready to talk, this leads us that US understands irans stand and tries to come to an agreement. This is really new
Again, we're listening to a great diplomat - every word is there for a reason.
He and is previous presidents are BIG liars. In his speach he talks about democracy movement in the middle east. But does not mention a single word about his NSA dilemma and again since he is in office he praises to close Guatanamo shortly. This is not a great diplomat. He mirrors a typical asswhole politicans who points to others but forgets what his country has recently done. Same like IRI.
That he knows English very well and uses great words, is of course marvellous.
He mentioned nothing about enrichment and he certainly did not suggest that Iran should be outside IAEA control. He said that the "issue of Iran's nuclear program" must be resolved. That encompasses a wide range of issues, two of which are enrichment and unconditional access to IAEA inspectors, but the most important aspect of it is "Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons" (quote/unquote).
You are right he did not mention that but as far as I remember he said that Iran has the right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purpose. And in others channels US gov. mentioned that enrichment needs to be under the control of IAEA
He's also not offering much by saying Iran can be a part of world politics - we already are - just not a useful part of it and that's because of the policies of our own government, not because of Obama! (
We are not a member of NATO neither we have been ever seen as a seriouse goverment who wants to be part of the global economy. I actually give this problem to the "west" which we all know stopped Shah to use its economical power to rule globally.
And he said nothing about Iran being treated unfairly in the past - again you're adding words that he did not use. He also said nothing about helping Iran advance economically. He said that our commitment to going down a different path will help the Iranian people in commerce and culture, etc.
Here again, this president offered Iran to sit down and talk. Actually, Iran should be happy that after all those severe sanctions US gov. still gives IRI the chance to discuss its differences out. US has Iran right in the corner and no more economical pressure is needed. However, when it gives IRI the chance to sit down after 36 years tells me US wants to help...
He's NOT saying anywhere in his speech that He's going to help us, rather he's making it VERY clear that we need to help ourselves.
And on that note, saying that US is NOT after regime change in Iran, should be considered a victory for Khamenei, Sepah and et. al. I'm not sure we should be the ones celebrating!
I do not see that it is a victory for Khameini and its gang. Reason here is that US is directing Iran to a table with fruits and water on it. Now, if IRI wants to taste those non Iranian fruit and accept its taste, shows IRI that it has no more power to eat its own juicy and tasty fruits anymore, Since those severe sanctions its goverment does not even have the chance to pick a fruit they liked so much in the past