Search results

He farted into the westward wind.

How pathetic.

Sad stuff. -------------------------------------- Click on the images and compare the captions.

Right off the bat, I'll mention that this isn't true. As for the nitty-gritty science involved in properly supporting my claim, it will have to wait for later tonight.[/size]

I have some familiarity with the argument, and I feel comfortable claiming it's one of the most hilarious things I've ever come across. I picked this up from another forum: Here's an excerpt from a letter published in a university newspaper: (written by a student with no background in physics...

I'm not sure what definition you glossed over on your own time, but "Intelligent Design" comes no where close to fulfilling the requirements of the definition that I provided. You must have missed the part where Dr. Hawking specified "few arbitrary elements", and "definite predictions"...

In part, a scientific theory is a testable, logically self-consistent model. [/size]In the words of Stephen Hawking: "A theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary...

It looks like an interesting paper, although I haven't been able to spend much time on it yet. I have no qualm with individuals who believe aspects of science help reaffirm their faith in a creator (in some form). Although, this is a far cry from those who believe their faith is the logical...

There's absolutely nothing wrong with exposing students to the countless, dogma-derived notions and concepts that have taken a foothold in human society over the ages. That being said, under no circumstances, should ideas revolving around creationism and intelligent design be taught in science...

Out of curiousity, can you explain their line of reasoning, and possibly pm me a pubmed link to the paper in question?

Now all we need is an Iranian circus monkey that communicates with its feces.

If I see another "letter to the editor" in our student paper, in defense of intelligent design as a scientific endeavor, I will lose all faith in the quality of instruction students receive at the undergraduate level. I don't care if you think a large bearded white man in the sky created...

The last four years are the best thing that could have ever happened to liberals in the US (and beyond). With Bush's approval ratings at an all-time low and the war in Iraq as unpopular as ever, Democrats could have asked for nothing more. In fact, if we give Bush an extra 4 years, he'll send...

Maybe they were trying to spell "serious" by copying off a hezbollahi sign construction manual, and drew the "u" upside-down.

122

Detroit Free Press He wants alternative theories taught August 2, 2005 BY RON HUTCHESON FREE PRESS WASHINGTON STAFF WASHINGTON -- President George W. Bush waded into the debate over evolution and "intelligent design" Monday, saying schools should teach both theories on the creation and...

I hope you realize that this point of view is a fairly hard one to remain consistent with. If you are of the opinion that under non-ideal governance, a nation shouldn't progress in certain areas [with the possibility of future abuse in mind], then you shouldn't be able to hold that same...

That's interesting, considering the fact that you can't go a week without using radioactive isotope labeling assays [currently unavailable to Iranian scientists] in most bioresearch-oriented laboratories.

You'd think that most "nationalists" would support the growth of science, industry, and self-sufficiency in their homeland.

Nice job.