Happening now...

Jul 5, 2009
3,012
360
South Dakota
This is what I am talking about, it seems the officers not sticking to a predetermined course or approach, it's all differnt from case to case!
All of these officers in this clip trying to help this guy (you might think it's a different country), the last officer even clearly offers the moron a helping hand, asking if he needs help and if he can drive him to the palce he's heading.

Its obvious the moron is on drugs. A sunshine jackoff!

 
Bloody fuck sake, he was not restrained while driving-drunk, someone from the restaurant called and complained about a guy who has fallen asleep in his car, (in the parking lot belonging to the restaurant).
He didn't get down when driving-drunk. No way the court could convict him of driving-drunk!
The cases should be examined separately from each other. I can't give this one to that idiot officer.

And yes, idiots without knowledge regarding the law make it even worse!
When it comes to designating someone an 'operator of a vehicle', the law does not distinguish between sleeping or racing. As soon as you're behind the steering wheel of a vehicle while in possession of the stater keys you're considered an operator of that vehicle. It's a shitty law I agree, but it's the law.

The man could've easily let them take him to the station and gone home probably without even a fine. There is no reason to resist the arrest. The officer is fully justified to arrest the man because that's his job and he's only enforcing the law of the state. Yes he could let him go home, but only a small percentage of such cases end up in people walking home drunk or getting a ride from the officer. The vast majority end up in a short arrest with a small fine. Some stupid judges have let people off with a fine after their 13th DUI arrest.
 
The poor cop has been fired without even a simple investigation or an interview, because the moron mayor of the city became the judge, jury and executioner herself. I hope he sues the city and wins (very very likely). The police in the US will soon start avoiding scenes with black suspects or subjects. The crime rate in liberal-run states/cities is about to become very interesting.
 
Likes: siavash_8
Jul 5, 2009
3,012
360
South Dakota
When it comes to designating someone an 'operator of a vehicle', the law does not distinguish between sleeping or racing. As soon as you're behind the steering wheel of a vehicle while in possession of the stater keys you're considered an operator of that vehicle. It's a shitty law I agree, but it's the law.
The man could've easily let them take him to the station and gone home probably without even a fine. There is no reason to resist the arrest. The officer is fully justified to arrest the man because that's his job and he's only enforcing the law of the state. Yes he could let him go home, but only a small percentage of such cases end up in people walking home drunk or getting a ride from the officer. The vast majority end up in a short arrest with a small fine. Some stupid judges have let people off with a fine after their 13th DUI arrest.
Black Lives Matter....none of my business, All Lives Matter....nor yet my business!
These are apparently empty and meningless words, all of it!

That officer did not "Do the Right Thing" out there and now has the blood of the father of a little kid on his hands. He needs to live with that fact for years to come!
Important to remeber, this situation affects us all at so many level, socializing, the view of each other, work, sports, relationships and so many other things and of course ...... economy!
"the systemic racism has held the U.S. economy back from reaching its full potential".
Robert Kaplan "Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas"

However, down here a bit out of the DrivingLaws;
Highlighting the important parts to trip over the squiggles!
Good luck if you even could convince the stately judge/juries considering to order the late man to attend the court of law.

Get a DUI for Sitting in a Parked Car While Drunk?
State laws differ, but most states require juries to look at the "totality of the circumstances" to determine whether the drunk motorist was operating or in actual physical control of the vehicle. In other words, the jury is supposed to consider all the surrounding circumstances. These often include the:
Location of the driver
Location of the car

Location of the keys
Whether the car’s engine was running, and
Whether the driver was awake or asleep.

Location of the Car
Car location is another key factor juries consider. If you were parked in your own driveway, you might escape responsibility. But a jury isn’t likely to be sympathetic to a motorist found parked in the middle of a roadway or on a sidewalk downtown. Basically, the car's location gives the jury an indication of whether the person was driving before police showed up and how much of a risk the person posed to the public.

Location of the Keys
Most cars require keys to start the engine. So, the location of the keys is important for assessing whether the driver was operating or in actual physical control of the vehicle. If the driver didn't have keys readily accessible, a jury might be unwilling to convict. But a driver who had the keys within reach or in the ignition won’t likely fare well with this issue at trial.

Whether the Car’s Engine Was Running
Being caught with the car engine running generally hurts a motorist’s chances of beating a DUI charge. With the engine running, the motorist is just a step away from putting the car in gear and driving away. However, other circumstances, including the driver's location, might also come into play here. For example, a motorist who was found asleep in the back seat on a cold night might be able to convince a jury that it was necessary to keep the engine running for heating the interior of the car.

Whether the Driver Was Awake or Asleep
Some states have a bright-line rule that says a driver must be awake to be operating or in actual physical control of a vehicle. But in most states, whether a driver was awake or asleep is just another factor for the jury to consider in.

Folks, having read all of these above, consider this:
The one without sin among you, let him cast the first stone"!
 
Oct 18, 2010
6,271
848
trump's regime is trying to extend the arms sanctions against iran
after the deadline comes to pass this fall based on the jcpoa accords.
iran has indicated that they will respond if the sanctions are not expired
at the deadline.
these are the 5 ways iran can respond:

1. limiting iaea inspections.
2. increasing the level of uranium enrichment.
3. stopping the implementation of the npt additional protocols.
4. leaving the jcpoa.
5. leaving npt.

iran has already started doing 1 & 2 and partly 3.
the other 2 options will be played out this fall.
 
Oct 18, 2010
6,271
848
and they did not even fight with guns.
only hand to hand combat o_O

India-China clash: 20 Indian troops killed in Ladakh fighting

At least 20 Indian soldiers were killed in a clash with Chinese forces in a disputed Himalayan border area, Indian officials say.
The incident follows rising tensions, and is the first deadly clash in the border area in at least 45 years.
The Indian army initially said three of its soldiers had been killed, adding that both sides suffered casualties.
But later on Tuesday, officials said a number of critically injured soldiers had died of their wounds.
 

siavash_8

Elite Member
Mar 26, 2006
3,605
4,764
Black sheriff defends officers' use of force in Brooks' killing
Georgia sheriff Alfonzo Williams, defends the officers' use of lethal force against Rayshard Brooks, a black man who was shot while running from police outside of a Wendy's, after resisting arrest.
 
Likes: Bache Tehroon
Oct 18, 2010
6,271
848
thugs in blue have become cry babies now.
calling in sick and crying for their emm order :p

Atlanta Police Officers Call Out Of Work After Officers Charged In Rayshard Brooks Case

A “higher than usual” number of Atlanta police officers called out of work Wednesday night after two officers were charged in the death of Rayshard Brooks, a Black man who was killed by police last week.

“The department is experiencing a higher than usual number of call outs with the incoming shift,” the police department tweeted Wednesday night. “We have enough resources to maintain operations & remain able to respond to incidents.”

The police department denied that officers had “walked off the job.” But Vince Champion, southeast regional director for the police union International Brotherhood of Police Officers, told NBC News that some officers were in fact protesting the charges by walking off the job and not responding to some calls.

“This is not an organized thing, it’s not a blue flu, it’s not a strike, it’s nothing like that,” Champion said. “What it actually is is officers protesting that they’ve had enough and they don’t want to deal with it any longer.”

It’s unclear how many officers called out or allegedly walked off the job. Neither the police department nor the police union immediately responded to HuffPost’s requests for comment.

 

ChaharMahal

Elite Member
Oct 18, 2002
16,563
261
I am looking for all people who hate unions come over and suck up to police unions and how it really helps them having so much power.
 

Zob Ahan

Elite Member
Feb 4, 2005
17,476
2,231
https://www.thetelegraph.com/news/article/Report-Iranian-ex-judge-dies-in-Romania-after-15352213.php

I guess IR ran out of vajebi:

Iranian ex-judge dies in Romania, falls from hotel window
Vadim Ghirda, Associated Press
Updated 1:22 pm CDT, Friday, June 19, 2020
Photo: Andreea Alexandru, AP




IMAGE 1 OF 15
Police cars are parked outside the Duke Hotel where Gholamreza Mansouri died after falling from a high floor inside a hotel, in Bucharest, Romania, Friday, June 19, 2020. Gholamreza Mansouri, a former judge ... more


BUCHAREST, Romania (AP) — A former Iranian judge sought by his country to face corruption charges died Friday after a fall in a hotel in Bucharest, the capital of Romania, the head of the Iranian police’s international department said.
The confirmation of Gholamreza Mansouri's death came from Romanian police, said Iran's Interpol chief Gen. Hadi Shirzad, who was quoted by Iran's semi-official INSA news agency.
Shirzad said Romanian authorities told Iran that the 66-year-old Mansouri "had thrown himself out of the window of his hotel in Bucharest.” An investigation by Iran's international police is underway, he said.

Earlier, Romanian police had confirmed only that a man had fallen from a high floor at a Bucharest hotel and was found dead at 2:30 p.m. (1130 GMT). They didn't identify him.
Mansouri, who fled Iran last year after authorities there alleged he took about 500,000 euros ($560,000) in bribes, was facing an extradition request by Iran and had denied the allegations. He said last week in a video statement that he left Iran for unspecified medical treatment and that coronavirus travel restrictions prevented him from returning to face the charges.
The spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry, Abbas Mousavi, said that his country asked Romanian authorities to send an official report, state-run IRNA news agency reported.
Mousavi said the judge had recently visited the Iranian Embassy and discussed how to return to Iran, “and because he was wanted by the Iranian judiciary through the international police, he was arrested by Romanian Interpol.”
Earlier this week, journalist rights groups and Iranian dissidents urged Romania to not deport Mansouri, saying he should be prosecuted in Europe for ordering the mass arrest of reporters while serving as a judge in Tehran.
The German chapter of Reporters Without Borders filed a complaint with federal prosecutors in Germany last week, urging that Mansouri be investigated on allegations of torture and human rights abuses for ordering the arrest of 20 reporters in Iran in 2013.
German prosecutors confirmed Wednesday they were looking into the complaint, and Reporters without Borders said it had now filed a second complaint with Romanian authorities after learning Mansouri had slipped away from Germany already.
It was not clear when Mansouri traveled to Romania, but Iran’s judiciary spokesman, Gholamhossein Esmaeili, said June 13 that Mansouri had been arrested there and was expected to be returned to Iran “in the following days.”
According to Romanian authorities, Mansouri had been released from custody but kept under “judicial control," during which he was banned from leaving the country and was obliged to present himself to authorities at their request.
Mansouri is best known for ordering the mass arrest of the reporters in 2013 toward the end of hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s time in office.
But in 2012, he also banned the reformist Shargh daily newspaper and detained its editor-in-chief over a published cartoon that authorities deemed insulting to those who fought in the Iran-Iraq war.