I do not care for any religion and I also do not care much for this shady character, but I am sorry to tell you whatever point he was trying to make neither supports nor clarifies the need to bring up her religious believes in to this. If her actions were as a result of her religious believes then you and this guy had a case, but there is not slightest sign and evidence that she acted out of her religious upbringing or teachings and thoughts.
It's one thing if a Hindu attacks a Muslim community, or a Muslim throw acid and stone on women and behead them, or a christian burn down a mosque, or ... in these examples all are fundamentalists acting on their belief system and religious teachings, but it is another thing to open fire on others out of madness, anger, frustration, mental disturbance, vengeance or ...where religious believes do not play a role. Hence emphasizing on non-related personal views is at best misleading and improper. And in the case of this self-claimed-wise guy it is also dishonest and pointing to the wrong direction.
By the way, if you have any means to, perhaps you can let this not-so-dana character know that when an activist is said to be a Kurdish, Balooch, Arab or ... activist (min. 3:40) it means that the said person is engaged in activities in regards to the issues related to that particular ethnicity and their rights and so on, so there is nothing wrong with identifying an activist based their interest and focus of their activities.