Iran war games

A8K

Elite Member
Oct 22, 2016
3,036
520
fuck.ir
#21
the pentagon is currently without a boss.
the caretaker resigned over allegation of domestic abuse.
if i were a comedian i would use this line:

this requires a response. the next time an iranian drone flies over US territory, shoot it down!

All the jaghy jerk offs of IR are happy but not know that the tracking signal protection was disabled so the drone could be tracked and possibly attacked. This was a bait, sepah fell for it...tell you jaghy friends at sepah and basij.

هاپهپاد.
رادارگریز هستند،مگر اینکه خودشون تعمدی
بخوان تو رادارها دیده و شکار بشن حتی ستاد استهلال بیت رهبری با اون همه بودجه و امکانات و نیروی متخصص قابلیت رهگیری اونها رو نداره!باورتون بشه یا نشه،سپاه تو همون تله‌ای افتاد و همون حماقتی رو کرد که آمریکا میخواست
 

A8K

Elite Member
Oct 22, 2016
3,036
520
fuck.ir
#22
Looks like I.R is being coached by others to start a war. Trump doesn't want it. Khamenei doesn't want it, but someone does.

Smells like a democrat plot in some ways. Could be Putin trying to get himself out of sanctions at the expense of Iran. Though it's true a president at war will likely get re-elected, Trump's situation is a bit different. He's an economics champion and a war could really do a number on him. He also has no media backing whatsoever.

Iran will eventually get their war. There's no way Sepah will sit down before taking a few punches and calling it a victory.

Hefty price to pay for a nation already poised for years of poverty and misery without a war.
Trump and allies doesn't want to do Iran unless it's for good and a slap on the wrist is dangerous and stupid.

They're tallying evidence and making a case. US failed in Venezuela so may go all in for Iran at some point.

Dont buy Trumps passiveness.
 
Likes: Zob Ahan
Oct 16, 2002
39,533
1,513
DarvAze DoolAb
www.iransportspress.com
#24
One theory is the US is trying to use the situation as a showcase for the region's instability to spread fear among the Arab freeloaders who have been enjoying US military presence for decades without paying up. Trump has always said "protection cannot be free". He even went as far as dictating this to Japan and South Korea.

It's interesting as soon as Trump hinted at the "no free protection for Japan/Korea", the North Korean regime decided to test a few missiles and then played nice with Trump for a while then went back to being hostile. Is it possible Japan and South Korea are being scared into paying more money for the US protection?

It's also interesting, Abe goes to Iran (for what?!) and suddenly tensions go through the roof. Is it possible he was there to tell Iran not to worry and keep up the hostility as part of US's plan for the Arab league? Maybe Trump told Abe "hey, if you don't wanna pay it all, you can team up with those Iranians and get the Arabs to pay instead."

Maybe all they're trying to do is get a shitload of money from the Arab nations for protection and then shift the focus to Iran and nuclear talks?

It's a theory.
 

Sly

Elite Member
Oct 18, 2002
28,748
878
#26
However, he told reporters it could have been the result of human error, saying: "I find it hard to believe it was intentional."
Man o man....his whole tone has changed and only god knows what is going on and what deals are being made between IR and Trump administration behind the scenes. It all started when Trump was in Japan.
 

oghabealborz

Elite Member
Feb 18, 2005
15,113
2,590
Strawberry field
#27
Sounds to me like people at the White House are waiting for something to materialize on their end before engaging Iran. Every single response by them could easily be translated to "Just wait a bit longer..."

It could be an economic event or a military one. Maybe they're waiting for Israel to get some stuff in order.

Interesting times...
I find it quite ironic that you see this situation as "interesting!
It's not a football match or a wrestling game.
These are critical times, there is a lot at stake and the outcome will effect everyone in the world as far as where we all live.
After 10 years of negotiations and two years of intense direct high level talks an agreement was reached and signed and endorsed by UN security Council and then trump walked away from the deal and brought back sanctions and threats and doing his outmost to stop Iran oil sales.
So who is provoking who?
The only solution to this is for u.s to back off and go back to the deal and then both sides make compromise.
Iran is not going to sit and watch others transit their oil through its waters while they can't.
 
Last edited:

Sly

Elite Member
Oct 18, 2002
28,748
878
#28
Trump Approves Strikes on Iran, but Then Abruptly Pulls Back



© Erin Schaff/The New York Times “Let’s see what happens,” President Trump said Thursday after Iran shot down an American surveillance drone.
WASHINGTON — President Trump approved military strikes against Iran in retaliation for downing an American surveillance drone, but pulled back from launching them on Thursday night after a day of escalating tensions.
As late as 7 p.m., military and diplomatic officials were expecting a strike, after intense discussions and debate at the White House among the president’s top national security officials and congressional leaders, according to multiple senior administration officials involved in or briefed on the deliberations.
© Tyler Hicks/The New York Times Yemeni fighters loyal to the Saudi-led coalition in January at the front line in Nehim, Yemen.
Officials said the president had initially approved attacks on a handful of Iranian targets, like radar and missile batteries.

The operation was underway in its early stages when it was called off, a senior administration official said. Planes were in the air and ships were in position, but no missiles had been fired when word came to stand down, the official said.
Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter
The abrupt reversal put a halt to what would have been the president’s third military action against targets in the Middle East. Mr. Trump had struck twice at targets in Syria, in 2017 and 2018.
It was not clear whether Mr. Trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or whether the administration altered course because of logistics or strategy. It was also not clear whether the attacks might still go forward.
Asked about the plans for a strike and the decision to hold back, the White House declined to comment, as did Pentagon officials. No government officials asked The New York Times to withhold the article.
The retaliation plan was intended as a response to the shooting down of the unmanned, $130 million surveillance drone, which was struck Thursday morning by an Iranian surface-to-air missile, according to a senior administration official who was briefed on the military planning and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss confidential plans.
The strike was set to take place just before dawn Friday in Iran to minimize risk to the Iranian military and civilians.
But military officials received word a short time later that the strike was off, at least temporarily.
The possibility of a retaliatory strike hung over Washington for much of the day. Officials in both countries traded accusations about the location of the drone when it was destroyed by a surface-to-air missile launched from the Iranian coast along the Gulf of Oman.
Mr. Trump’s national security advisers split about whether to respond militarily. Senior administration officials said Secretary of State Mike Pompeo; John R. Bolton, the national security adviser; and Gina Haspel, the C.I.A. director, had favored a military response. But top Pentagon officials cautioned that such an action could result in a spiraling escalation with risks for American forces in the region.
Congressional leaders were briefed by administration officials in the Situation Room.
The destruction of the drone underscored the already tense relations between the two countries after Mr. Trump’s recent accusations that Iran is to blame for explosions last week that damaged oil tankers traveling through the strait, the vital waterway for much of the world’s oil. Iran has denied that accusation.
Iran’s announcement this week that it would soon breach one of the key limits it had agreed to in a 2015 pact intended to limit its nuclear program has also fueled tensions. Mr. Trump, who pulled the United States out of the 2015 pact, has vowed that he will not allow Tehran to build a nuclear weapon.

Slide 1 of 39: President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, June 20, 2019, in Washington. Trump declared Thursday that "Iran made a very big mistake" in shooting down a U.S. drone but suggested it was an accident rather than a strategic error.
Next Slide
Full screen



https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...bruptly-pulls-back/ar-AADaA3K?ocid=spartandhp
 

A8K

Elite Member
Oct 22, 2016
3,036
520
fuck.ir
#29
One theory is the US is trying to use the situation as a showcase for the region's instability to spread fear among the Arab freeloaders who have been enjoying US military presence for decades without paying up. Trump has always said "protection cannot be free". He even went as far as dictating this to Japan and South Korea.

It's interesting as soon as Trump hinted at the "no free protection for Japan/Korea", the North Korean regime decided to test a few missiles and then played nice with Trump for a while then went back to being hostile. Is it possible Japan and South Korea are being scared into paying more money for the US protection?

It's also interesting, Abe goes to Iran (for what?!) and suddenly tensions go through the roof. Is it possible he was there to tell Iran not to worry and keep up the hostility as part of US's plan for the Arab league? Maybe Trump told Abe "hey, if you don't wanna pay it all, you can team up with those Iranians and get the Arabs to pay instead."

Maybe all they're trying to do is get a shitload of money from the Arab nations for protection and then shift the focus to Iran and nuclear talks?

It's a theory.
At first read I was going to suggest you take you esfenaj more regularly by the 2nd read I was reminded Trump is probably selling subscription-based stability in the region along with a month of free HBO.
 
Oct 16, 2002
39,533
1,513
DarvAze DoolAb
www.iransportspress.com
#31
I find it quite ironic that you see this situation as "interesting!
It's not a football match or a wrestling game.
These are critical times, there is a lot at stake and the outcome will effect everyone in the world as far as where we all live.
After 10 years of negotiations and two years of intense direct high level talks an agreement was reached and signed and endorsed by UN security Council and then trump walked away from the deal and brought back sanctions and threats and doing his outmost to stop Iran oil sales.
So who is provoking who?
The only solution to this is for u.s to back off and go back to the deal and then both sides make compromise.
Iran is not going to sit and watch others transit their oil through its waters while they can't.
You are a boatload of nonsense, day in, day out! Must be tiring carrying all that nonsense around.

Your "only solution" is a no go sir. Try again.
 

oghabealborz

Elite Member
Feb 18, 2005
15,113
2,590
Strawberry field
#32
You are a boatload of nonsense, day in, day out! Must be tiring carrying all that nonsense around.

Your "only solution" is a no go sir. Try again.
LOL!
OK Mr allsense which part of my post didn't make sense to you?
The part of this you find interesting times or the provocation part?
Or the part about the deal that even the closest allies of u.s criticised them for breaking it up while Iran was keeping her part of the deal.
 
Oct 16, 2002
39,533
1,513
DarvAze DoolAb
www.iransportspress.com
#34
LOL!
OK Mr allsense which part of my post didn't make sense to you?
The part where you conveniently forget Iran's deceitful and hostile nature. The part where you ignore the fact that Iran received over $150B from Obama and only escalated its presence in Syria, Yemen and Iraq via proxies. The part where USA, Israel, and the Arab nations neighboring Iran received fuck-all from Obama's deal while Sepah benefited immensely.

Iran is not going to sit and watch others transit their oil through its waters while they can't.
Iran is doing exactly that and will continue to do that for quite a while. Sorry to disappoint you :)
 
Likes: Zob Ahan

oghabealborz

Elite Member
Feb 18, 2005
15,113
2,590
Strawberry field
#35
The part where you conveniently forget Iran's deceitful and hostile nature. The part where you ignore the fact that Iran received over $150B from Obama and only escalated its presence in Syria, Yemen and Iraq via proxies. The part where USA, Israel, and the Arab nations neighboring Iran received fuck-all from Obama's deal while Sepah benefited immensely.


Iran is doing exactly that and will continue to do that for quite a while. Sorry to disappoint you :)
What a Load of bollocks... Iran is no more hostile than Saudi and what the are doing.
The whole world backed that deal and criticised u.s for walking away.
But not you with all the sense in the world.

Enjoy these interesting! Times while the rest worry about the outcome of all this bleak times.
 
Oct 16, 2002
39,533
1,513
DarvAze DoolAb
www.iransportspress.com
#36
What a Load of bollocks... Iran is no more hostile than Saudi and what the are doing.
The whole world backed that deal and criticised u.s for walking away.
But not you with all the sense in the world.

Enjoy these interesting! Times while the rest worry about the outcome of all this bleak times.
You keep worrying and cheering for Iran while I eat popcorn and enjoy these interesting times. Keep lying to that face in the mirror while playing "caring" and "worried"! LOL!

The whole world can criticize Trump all it wants. He did the right thing with the Iran deal. He's the only US president who has done anything meaningful for the ever ungreatful, uneducated and lazy Iranian so called 'opposition'. It's only because of his administration that people can freely speak of the regime's downfall. It's because of Trump's transparency that even a cunt like Khamenei has been forced to be more transparent. Iranian people now know exactly what they're dealing with (shame it took them this long). If they like it, they stick with it. If they don't, they don't. Not a concern of Trump or any foreign leader.

Iranians suffering due to Rial's devaluation is not Trump's fault.
 

IEI

Administrator
Staff member
Nov 10, 2002
14,500
3,336
#37
You keep worrying and cheering for Iran while I eat popcorn and enjoy these interesting times. Keep lying to that face in the mirror while playing "caring" and "worried"! LOL!

The whole world can criticize Trump all it wants. He did the right thing with the Iran deal. He's the only US president who has done anything meaningful for the ever ungreatful, uneducated and lazy Iranian so called 'opposition'. It's only because of his administration that people can freely speak of the regime's downfall. It's because of Trump's transparency that even a cunt like Khamenei has been forced to be more transparent. Iranian people now know exactly what they're dealing with (shame it took them this long). If they like it, they stick with it. If they don't, they don't. Not a concern of Trump or any foreign leader.

Iranians suffering due to Rial's devaluation is not Trump's fault.
I don't agree with Trump's ideology either but his policy against Iran has been 100% correct.
40 years of "Dozdi" has lead Iran to this disaster and has got nothing to do with sanctions.
 
Oct 16, 2002
39,533
1,513
DarvAze DoolAb
www.iransportspress.com
#38
I don't agree with Trump's ideology either but his policy against Iran has been 100% correct.
40 years of "Dozdi" has lead Iran to this disaster and has got nothing to do with sanctions.
Not necessarily dozdi, but 40 years of wrong investments. Iran decided to print money and invest its future in arming up and playing the nuclear card. Well, it's paying dividends now. Why is that a surprise or even remotely Trump's fault?!

It's not like Iran had no choice. All the choices were Iran's. The world simply reacted or didn't react to Iran's choices.
 
May 9, 2004
15,166
179
#40
All the jaghy jerk offs of IR are happy but not know that the tracking signal protection was disabled so the drone could be tracked and possibly attacked. This was a bait, sepah fell for it...tell you jaghy friends at sepah and basij.

هاپهپاد.
رادارگریز هستند،مگر اینکه خودشون تعمدی
بخوان تو رادارها دیده و شکار بشن حتی ستاد استهلال بیت رهبری با اون همه بودجه و امکانات و نیروی متخصص قابلیت رهگیری اونها رو نداره!باورتون بشه یا نشه،سپاه تو همون تله‌ای افتاد و همون حماقتی رو کرد که آمریکا میخواست

بله شما درست میگی
سال 2011 که ارکیو 170 رو سپاه گرفت ایرانی ها افتادن تو تله
بعد که چند تن از نیروی دریایی امریکا رو دئستگیر کرد هم افتاد تو تله
تو سوریه هم گفتید ایران افتاد تو تله
تو عراق هم وقتی نیرو فرستاد گفتید افتاد تو تله
تو یمن و لبنان هم افتاد تو تله
وقتی امرامکو عربستان رو زد هم افتاد تو تله
تو دریای عمان که دو تا نفتکش رو زد افتاد تو تله
الان هم افتادن تو تله
چند سال بعد ایران ناو هواپیما بر امریکا رو میزنه و می افته تو تله
ایران همش میفته تو تله
اخه تا کی میخواد بیفته تو تله

:geek: