Sit at Home Moms!!

[Pahlevoon Nayeb]

No, you were paraphrasing from wiki and it was sad...and wrong.

I wasn’t paraphrasing moron, it was a direct quote. Go read it and stop humiliating yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_economics directly under “Historical Origins.”

Yes, when you set up welfare programs, you are definitively doing that. Bringing resources under government control. Do you even know the simplest definitions?

Another arcane argument by the stupid kid! Simply having a welfare program a socialist society does not make dummy. But, by all means, keep hiding in your books.

Yes, America, especially since the early 1900s has turned into a country with lots of socialist tendencies and programs. This is not really in dispute between the right or left. Whether they should have them is the dispute. Have you only recently started following politics? Another embarrassing statement.

Yes, the "shining beacon" of Capitalism has really been a Socialist nation all along, never mind the Communist witch hunts of the forties and fifties, never mind the matter of a little thing called the COLD WAR (LOL), never mind that even mentioning the word Socialist at the border might ban you from entering the country.

But, by all means, like I said, go ahead and call Ronald Reagan a Communist and US a Socialist nation if the ever let you into this country and see what will greet your dumb ass.

Keep reading them books though, you might impress some girl yet

Hahahahaha, so you just admitted you know fuck-all about these distinctions. You're going by what the meeja, or the left-wing nutjobs say. A 'conservative' is a lot of things. Reagan wasn't a fiscal conservative. Reagan, wasn't a "Friedmanian" and he certainly wasn't an Austrian follower. He claimed to follow their ideals, but as has been proven - ad nauseam - he wasn't that.

Dip shit, get this through your thick skull: No one cares if he learned basket weaving in Mongolia, he is, was, and will always be known as the conservative president of this country, no matter how much you bang your head against the wall. No one cares about your books in this country dumbass!

LOL @ pencil neck. Keep 'em coming old timer.

Dickwad? Jackass? Dipshit? Shit-for-brains? Ummm… Asswipe?

See anyone advocate anarchy? Nice try moron.

Anarchy? What planet do you live on shmuck?

Pencil-neck and Virgin.

We know, you don’t have to advertise it

Awesome comebacks. Say hi to your wife for me.

Pretty good, if I may say so myself! But, how pathetic are you to now be resorting to potential family member insults! Poor soul!

I’m too busy with my students to have a wife ( ), but I will say hello to the single, equally-pathetic woman that might have ever taken pity on your ass

See, this is you giving yourself away again for the dumbass you are. Yeah, they overlap. But they don't overlap when it comes to Reagan's policies. It means they both oppose increasing government spending and propping up government departments. Another whopper.

Whopper is a burger they sell at Burger King.

Reagan did destroy butt-loads of regulaitons and that’s a fact. Now, carry on with committing hari-kari insisting that he did not.

Instead of trying to look like you know something then shitting on yourself because you don't even know the basics...actually, keep doing it, it's funny.

I do love making a monkey out your ass though

No, it isn't. That's the whole point of the Fed. You can't have laissez faire when there is a body regulating the money supply. That is why Friedman, ultimately, and the Austrians, always, wanted to abolish it. Don't worry, you didn't know the basics, I didn't expect your dumbass to know that.

No economic principal can exist in its dogmatic pure form anywhere in the world, idiot. This is why USSR ultimately proved unsustainable; this is why China is now a pseudo Capitalist society; and this is what they don’t teach you in those books you’ve been cramming.

It certainly, definitely, without question, means Reagan wasn't a fiscal conservative. So whether you think removing some regulations goes towards free market principles, increasing the size of government spending more than any President in history completely shits on the "keeping government small" concept.

Certainly, definitely, without question, for sure, it wasn’t it wasn’t it wasn’t … so does the stupid child jump up and down foaming at the mouth. LOL

At this rate, you’ll have a heart attack and die delivering your diatribe. As stupid and misguided as you are, I’m concerned about your health.

Haha, another victory. First you went to calling Reagan a "Friedmanian", then learning that he was actually a disciple of Austrian economics, to now saying no one cares. Khob ja-kesh, hamoon aval zer nemizadi.

You really are stupid.

Olagh jon, “no one cares” means “no none cares.” I know it’s difficult for your dogmatic, puny brain to grasp this, but do your best: we never debated if Reagan was a disciple of Canadian school of basket weaving or Austrian school of chocolate making in this country; the man has always been known as the conservative that he was. It makes no difference what your stupid books tell you to regurgitate.

Is this another fairy tale digression? Reagan a communist and Obama is shrinking the size of government - despite the fact that he made the biggest government handout in human history? When you learn what these terms are, you'll answer your own questions.

No stupid, if according to your dumb ass Reagan was a Socialist (LOL), then dubya and poppy Bush had to have been Communists. Do you get that simple analogy?

Communists, no. Socialists, yes, really, definitively. They promote government programs and use their resource to meddle in the private affairs of citizens. You know, like Reagan spending 1.7 billion on the "War on Drugs" whereas a "Friedmanian" or an Austrian would call for making them legal. Or Bush and TARP.

Show me ONE pure “Friedmanian” politican that has EVER lived on this planet. Until then, take a flying leap

Coup de grace. This moron talks about me being lynched in America if I called Reagan a socialist - despite the fact that many people do...including the current President he idolises. You couldn't make this kind of idiocy up. And it isn't made up, it exists in this moron called PN.

I didn’t say lynch, I said “shove a hot poker up your stupid ass.”

You’re so utterly inept that you don’t get that Obama made those comments in the context of today’s Republican party politics, you know like how within the context of this thread you are a certifiable moron!

Then again, it's a pretty good chance that you're moron outside of its context too. LOL

 

[Kaz]

I wasn’t paraphrasing moron, it was a direct quote. Go read it and stop humiliating yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_economics directly under “Historical Origins.”

I wasn't talking about one of your posts silly old man, I was talking about all of them in general. The fact that you quoted Wiki, after we're talking about scholarly sources, showed how stupid you are.

You were so pathetic that the one time you cited a proper source it was outside of the field, and even then only quoted the intro that doesn't make any real sense. I have shat piles with more brains than you.

Another arcane argument by the stupid kid! Simply having a welfare program a socialist society does not make dummy. But, by all means, keep hiding in your books.

Moron, let's break it down: using 1.7 billion dollars to aid criminalisation of drugs =/= liberty or free market or Austrian or "Friedmanian". Whilst one program may not make a system socialist, several of them do. That's kind of the point.

Yes, the "shining beacon" of Capitalism has really been a Socialist nation all along, never mind the Communist witch hunts of the forties and fifties, never mind the matter of a little thing called the COLD WAR (LOL), never mind that even mentioning the word Socialist at the border might ban you from entering the country.

Sure it would, just like how calling Reagan a socialist would get you lynched. Ahem, go tell your Pres that.

Depends which era you're talking about. Prior to the Fed, America had one of the greatest expansions in wealth and freedoms in human history. Since then, which is not too long - early 1900s - it has moved more and more towards the cold war ideals it hated. That's not an opinion, that's a fact. Americans give, what, half their pay to state and federal governments? You're a funny guy. I guess you believe in Batman and Joker too.

Dip shit, get this through your thick skull: No one cares if he learned basket weaving in Mongolia, he is, was, and will always be known as the conservative president of this country, no matter how much you bang your head against the wall. No one cares about your books in this country dumbass!

No one cares about claims that are definitively wrong. People think America have a free market in health care. It definitively doesn't exist. Reagan was in charge of the biggest expansion in government in US history. That's the reality. The fact that idiots like you might believe it is neither here nor there.

Dickwad? Jackass? Dipshit? Shit-for-brains? Ummm… Asswipe?

Try harder, come on? Wiki some insults, even.

Anarchy? What planet do you live on shmuck?

Moron, you were talking about why even have a system of government - as if I wanted no government, or anarchy. You should try reading the constitution of the country you reside in. How can we argue if you don't remember a context you bring up? How do you survive to get through the day?

We know, you don’t have to advertise it

As I said, say hi to your wife for me .

Pretty good, if I may say so myself! But, how pathetic are you to now be resorting to potential family member insults! Poor soul!

I’m too busy with my students to have a wife ( ), but I will say hello to the single, equally-pathetic woman that might have ever taken pity on your ass

Of course you'd say so, you're the idiot, remember?

So you don't have a wife? I thought I'd at least give you that but not even a wife? Damn, you're even worse than I thought. Bro, go to Mexico and get laid...now! They're desperate but they'll take you...hopefully.

Whopper is a burger they sell at Burger King.

It's also a huge embarrassing mistake, like your mother not swallowing you.

Reagan did destroy butt-loads of regulaitons and that’s a fact. Now, carry on with committing hari-kari insisting that he did not.

He also created them, and increased the size of government to record breaking levels, etc. This was already shown to you on the last episode of you getting shat on.

I do love making a monkey out your ass though

That's what's so funny about it. Getting you to reply again and again, and seeing you make a joke of yourself again and again, for my amusement. Keep it up .

No economic principal can exist in its dogmatic pure form anywhere in the world, idiot. This is why USSR ultimately proved unsustainable; this is why China is now a pseudo Capitalist society; and this is what they don’t teach you in those books you’ve been cramming.

Ok, let's track back once again so you can remember what a dumbfuck you are: you said there was laissez faire and interventionism sitting side by side. Hello, they don't exist in the same realms or the same spheres. They are the antonyms of each other. As long as you have the Fed, which is not some incidental act of intervention...but the 3 headed beast representing it, you can't have laissez faire since the money supply itself is being manipulated - the very means of exchange. These are the statements you make and we know you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Your argument, btw, is precisely why socialism is a sham. Read more wiki to discover why .

You really are stupid.

Olagh jon, “no one cares” means “no none cares.” I know it’s difficult for your dogmatic, puny brain to grasp this, but do your best: we never debated if Reagan was a disciple of Canadian school of basket weaving or Austrian school of chocolate making in this country; the man has always been known as the conservative that he was. It makes no difference what your stupid books tell you to regurgitate.

I guess today is the day we have to go over why you were such a fuckwit in the past to jog your memory as to why you're such a fuckwit now. You tried to dress down Friedman by saying Reaganomics was based on "Friedmanian" principles. You were not only too stupid to not know that such a thing didn't exist, but that Reagan was actually a disciple of the Austrian school of economics. I further shat on you when I showed most of his actions in government went to the principles that both schools of economics abhorred. To further smear it on your face, I gave you articles at the time showing this.

Now you're asking why they're being discussed at all. As I said, ja-kesh, hamoon aval zer nemizadi, be khodet nemiridi va vaght mano va bandwithe site ro haroom nemikardi.

Ey baba

No stupid, if according to your dumb ass Reagan was a Socialist (LOL), then dubya and poppy Bush had to have been Communists. Do you get that simple analogy?

No, because no one is calling any of them communists. Socialists aren't necessarily communists, get it? They are all interventionists however and have instigated great socialist policies. They're not very different, they're basically the same. Maybe you should push for a constitutional amendment so that they start wearing uniforms so you can tell them apart?

Show me ONE pure “Friedmanian” politican that has EVER lived on this planet. Until then, take a flying leap

Dumb fuck, there is one running for the Presidency right now, nevermind the past.

You’re so utterly inept that you don’t get that Obama made those comments in the context of today’s Republican party politics, you know like how within the context of this thread you are a certifiable moron!

Then again, it's a pretty good chance that you're moron outside of its context too. LOL

You got owned and you keep getting owned. He tried to appeal to the centre to say "hey, I am just doing what Reagan did, so we must both be socialists". Well, yeah, he is largely. It's an interesting tactic, because the Rs have to either change their position now or they have to admit Reagan's presidency in terms of fiscal conservatism was a fraud.

It doesn't change the fact that you, who tried to take the discussion into arguing Reaganomics (thinking I'd support those policies), now have to deal with a President you idolise who is using the very same policies. So if Reagan was shit and his economics was shit, so is your idol. As I said, nice one; arguing yourself into a corner like the mental midget you are.

 

[Pahlevoon Nayeb]

OK, back from my vacation and ready to make a monkey out of this idiot yet again. Let's see...

I wasn't talking about one of your posts silly old man, I was talking about all of them in general. The fact that you quoted Wiki, after we're talking about scholarly sources, showed how stupid you are.

I quoted wiki only after your stupid ass asked for it shmuck! Play stupid much Olagh?

You were so pathetic that the one time you cited a proper source it was outside of the field, and even then only quoted the intro that doesn't make any real sense. I have shat piles with more brains than you.

You wouldn’t know a proper source if it hit you on your head

Moron, let's break it down: using 1.7 billion dollars to aid criminalisation of drugs =/= liberty or free market or Austrian or "Friedmanian". Whilst one program may not make a system socialist, several of them do. That's kind of the point.

Goosaleh, let’s break it down: NO ONE GIVES A FUCK ABOUT YOUR STUPID AUSTRIAN chocolate makers! Now, on with calling Reagan a communist! LOL!

Sure it would, just like how calling Reagan a socialist would get you lynched. Ahem, go tell your Pres that.

I seriously think it must have been an accident that has made you such a stubborn mental midget. Stupid, Obama called Reagan in the context of… oh , never mind, you’re too stupid to get it anyway…

Depends which era you're talking about. Prior to the Fed, America had one of the greatest expansions in wealth and freedoms in human history. Since then, which is not too long - early 1900s - it has moved more and more towards the cold war ideals it hated. That's not an opinion, that's a fact. Americans give, what, half their pay to state and federal governments? You're a funny guy. I guess you believe in Batman and Joker too.

Shit-for-brains, It’s called running a country. What do you want a government to run on, shit coming out of the assholes of stupid wannabe morons like you who haven’t even set foot in this country, much less even have a responsibility -- or civic pride, or care, or love -- for this nation? Leave your bullshit for the stupid girls you’re trying to impress dummy. Keep working on it though, one of these years you’ll lose it (your virginity )

No one cares about claims that are definitively wrong. People think America have a free market in health care. It definitively doesn't exist. Reagan was in charge of the biggest expansion in government in US history. That's the reality. The fact that idiots like you might believe it is neither here nor there.

People like me run this country while jackasses like you just shoot off your mouths in hopes of being let into this country one day. Reagan has been, is, will always be the shining beacon of neo-conservatism to Americans, left, right, or center, regardless of how much you bang your empty head against the wall Olagh jon! Get it?

Try harder, come on? Wiki some insults, even.

Too good for a blabbering idiot like you.

Moron, you were talking about why even have a system of government - as if I wanted no government, or anarchy. You should try reading the constitution of the country you reside in. How can we argue if you don't remember a context you bring up? How do you survive to get through the day?

LOL! Junior, like I said, I read the Constitution of this country while you were sucking on your mommy tits. Your normal practice of misdirection and bait and switch is well known in these quarters!

As I said, say hi to your wife for me .

Yup, you’re both stupid and illiterate. Then again, the system that educated you cannot but create mental midgets who can’t read. If you insist, I’ll say hello to whomever you want me to, including your mother and your sister.

Of course you'd say so, you're the idiot, remember?

No, but I remember you being a shit-for-brains

So you don't have a wife? I thought I'd at least give you that but not even a wife? Damn, you're even worse than I thought. Bro, go to Mexico and get laid...now! They're desperate but they'll take you...hopefully.

LOL! Nice try moron. At least I don’t cram over the weekend to talk about bullshit no one cares about. Has it yielded in a sympathy fuck yet or are you still a miserable, stupid virgin dying for female affection?

It's also a huge embarrassing mistake, like your mother not swallowing you.

You mean like the shit that your daddy took in your mother's mouth, instead of the toilet, and you came out? Or, might there be several candidates?

He also created them, and increased the size of government to record breaking levels, etc. This was already shown to you on the last episode of you getting shat on.

Come on, I know you’re made of shit, but stop showing your love of the word fuckface.

That's what's so funny about it. Getting you to reply again and again, and seeing you make a joke of yourself again and again, for my amusement. Keep it up .

Stupid, I’m having the time of my life exposing you for the dumbfuck, stupid, idiotic, bigmouth, bastard (and I mean that in a biological way) jackass that you are. What in the hell are you going on about goosaleh?

Ok, let's track back once again so you can remember what a dumbfuck you are: you said there was laissez faire and interventionism sitting side by side. Hello, they don't exist in the same realms or the same spheres. They are the antonyms of each other. As long as you have the Fed, which is not some incidental act of intervention...but the 3 headed beast representing it, you can't have laissez faire since the money supply itself is being manipulated - the very means of exchange. These are the statements you make and we know you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Dip-shit, like I asked once and in your normal bait and switch manner (you’re good at that. Are you a merchant of your mother and sisters's affection by any chance?! ) you never replied, name me ONE country that is COMPLETELY laissez faire or SHUT THE FUCK UP asshole!

Your argument, btw, is precisely why socialism is a sham. Read more wiki to discover why .

Good enough for dickhead like you

I guess today is the day we have to go over why you were such a fuckwit in the past to jog your memory as to why you're such a fuckwit now. You tried to dress down Friedman by saying Reaganomics was based on "Friedmanian" principles. You were not only too stupid to not know that such a thing didn't exist, but that Reagan was actually a disciple of the Austrian school of economics. I further shat on you when I showed most of his actions in government went to the principles that both schools of economics abhorred. To further smear it on your face, I gave you articles at the time showing this.

What you “shat” on was your own stupid face by showing what a piece of shit know-nothing dumbfuck you are. I’ve been stringing you along every step of the way and you’re such a ego-freak asshole that you don’t even get it’s you who's being “shat” on moron!

Now you're asking why they're being discussed at all. As I said, ja-kesh, hamoon aval zer nemizadi, be khodet nemiridi va vaght mano va bandwithe site ro haroom nemikardi.

Ey baba

Avvalan Jakesh oon pedareh dayoosteh ke toyeh goosaleh ro too naneyeh jendat kasht. Secondly, let me repeat this again so that even someone with the limited mental capacity of the obviously malnourish-brained moron that you are can get: no one gives a fuck about Reagan being a disciple of Australian school of chocolate making. Get it asshole?

No, because no one is calling any of them communists. Socialists aren't necessarily communists, get it? They are all interventionists however and have instigated great socialist policies. They're not very different, they're basically the same. Maybe you should push for a constitutional amendment so that they start wearing uniforms so you can tell them apart?

Socialist is a relative term that an Olagh like you doesn’t get. You keep sticking your head inside Friedman’s shorts and giving the dead man repeated blow jobs thinking you’re smart. The fact of the matter remains that US is far less socialistic than many European nations and, yes, idiot, the logical result of socialism is Communism, in case they didn’t teach you that in the shitholes you’ve called school.

Dumb fuck, there is one running for the Presidency right now, nevermind the past.

Asshole, he WAS running, but was never nominated, which makes what he has had to say IRRELEVANT! Capiche?

You got owned and you keep getting owned.

The only thing you ever owned was what’s inside my pants and I don’t swing that way, though we know a fag like you does

It doesn't change the fact that you, who tried to take the discussion into arguing Reaganomics (thinking I'd support those policies), now have to deal with a President you idolise who is using the very same policies. So if Reagan was shit and his economics was shit, so is your idol. As I said, nice one; arguing yourself into a corner like the mental midget you are.

Sometimes I wonder if there isn’t some credence to not allowing stupid people pro-create for the end result is a dumbfuck like you. You make a good case for abortion (or, in your case, anti-diarrhea medicine).
Olagh jon, who is it you think I idolize? Obama? He's FAR from anything I idolize, but he’s the only option in the room that is fit for slightly more than a dog catcher, which is exactly what Romney is good for.
Now fuck off before I take another shit on your face, though you've probably been loving it in a masochistic way!

 

[Flint]

OK, back from my vacation

You shouldn't have. Besides, Sandra Fluke by now is married and moved on. Nobody cares. She has since found that $4 Walmart case of pills.

 

[Pahlevoon Nayeb]

You shouldn't have. Besides, Sandra Fluke by now is married and moved on. Nobody cares. She has since found that $4 Walmart case of pills.

Who died and made you boss? If nobody cares, why are you still whining then?

 

[Flint]

 

[Pahlevoon Nayeb]

View attachment 30577