Dear Khodam - you keep asking for evidence.......what kind of evidence? A written confession from TP?
Here is the link to some of his e-mails to IR officials which came out in the court process...Daei attorneys revealed them years ago...
http://iranpoliticsclub.net/movement/trita-tehran/index.htm
http://iranpoliticsclub.net/movement/trita-tehran/index.htm
Also, even if he exchanged those emails with Zarif it doesn't mean he was working for IRI. At those times he was lobbying for and facilitating direct talks between Khatami's government and US administration. Just exchanging emails with Zarif doesn't make the guy a traitor. Zarif was friends with Charlie Rose, and I'm sure they exchanged emails. Does that make Charlie Rose an IRI agent?
Couple of years ago I posted an article about a US senate hearing in which TP testified....part of his testimony was that majority of Iranians support IR......a US Senator asked him: What do the rest support? I don't have an archive.........
NIAC Memo: What Obama Must Do Now On Iran
And what he says: "But here is one legitimate criticism , the Iranians are missing two words from Obama: "I condemn." Protesters and political leaders I've spoken to in Iran want the US to speak out forcefully against the government's human rights abuses and condemn the violence. Philosophical formulations about respecting the wishes of the Iranian people aren't enough: The president should clearly condemn the Iranian government's violations and use of brutal force against its own people."
Also - In response to what NIAC has done against IR - on top of your list was actions for Human Rights in Iran...!!! You do remember just a few short years ago NIAC and Trita refused to address anything relating to IR human rights violations, and openly admitted to it.
But also remember that before this government, they were very much involved in a rapprochement between IRI and US, that's what they believed in. I can see that they would refrain from criticizing the regime while they move on the engagement front. I don't agree with it, but I can understand it. That said, I still would like to see where they say that.