Not a very difficult issue – but few Iranian fools, many IR supporters, and a herd of IR Employess try to make it a difficult question!! When it comes to this question – the following Iranian voices can be heard from outside Iran – (I will not address the Iranians inside Iran in this thread, when it comes to voicing opinion, it is the whole different situation inside Iran):
1: IR sympathizers and employees who openly support the regime and say the world has no right to meddle in Iran’s internal affairs. These folks know the biggest threat against IR includes outside military actions against IR, and call those in favor of keeping this option on the table as sellouts who wish to see their country bombed!!
2: IR sympathizers and employees who do not openly support IR, but keep pushing for IR agenda, with a different excuse every-time! These Iranians usually use the only available and obvious argument which is to save innocent Iranians inside Iran from wars and bombs. These folks also know the biggest threat against IR includes outside military actions against IR, and call those in favor of keeping this option on the table as sellouts who wish to see their country bombed!!
3: Anti IR Iranians who actually want to save Iran from wars and bombs. For the most parts, these folks suggest a movement from within (including movements to topple IR or reforms leading to toppling IR) as a way to deal with IR.
4: Anti IR Iranians who do not wish to see wars and bombs in Iran (or anywhere else), but have a bigger worry. The world giving IR military amnesty! We (yes I fall in this category) are against the world giving IR any kind of notoriety or clearances. Our argument is that given “Carte Blanche”, IR will be and would have been 100 times more brutal against their hostages, Iranian, inside Iran. We support ANY non-military movement (including targeted reforms leading to toppling IR) or from within or outside – but we demand the military option to remain on the table as long as Iran is occupied. We often can’t see any Iranian living outside Iran to be supportive of ANY action benefiting IR – and we do have a tendency to call them sell-outs or Sandis driven.
As I said – none of the above applies to Iranians inside Iran – whole different sets of rules of conduct apple when one lives under siege.
Comments from Natural and Iranpaak are especially welcomed!!!
1: IR sympathizers and employees who openly support the regime and say the world has no right to meddle in Iran’s internal affairs. These folks know the biggest threat against IR includes outside military actions against IR, and call those in favor of keeping this option on the table as sellouts who wish to see their country bombed!!
2: IR sympathizers and employees who do not openly support IR, but keep pushing for IR agenda, with a different excuse every-time! These Iranians usually use the only available and obvious argument which is to save innocent Iranians inside Iran from wars and bombs. These folks also know the biggest threat against IR includes outside military actions against IR, and call those in favor of keeping this option on the table as sellouts who wish to see their country bombed!!
3: Anti IR Iranians who actually want to save Iran from wars and bombs. For the most parts, these folks suggest a movement from within (including movements to topple IR or reforms leading to toppling IR) as a way to deal with IR.
4: Anti IR Iranians who do not wish to see wars and bombs in Iran (or anywhere else), but have a bigger worry. The world giving IR military amnesty! We (yes I fall in this category) are against the world giving IR any kind of notoriety or clearances. Our argument is that given “Carte Blanche”, IR will be and would have been 100 times more brutal against their hostages, Iranian, inside Iran. We support ANY non-military movement (including targeted reforms leading to toppling IR) or from within or outside – but we demand the military option to remain on the table as long as Iran is occupied. We often can’t see any Iranian living outside Iran to be supportive of ANY action benefiting IR – and we do have a tendency to call them sell-outs or Sandis driven.
As I said – none of the above applies to Iranians inside Iran – whole different sets of rules of conduct apple when one lives under siege.
Comments from Natural and Iranpaak are especially welcomed!!!
Last edited:
