Are you stupid? You keep talking about what Reagan was purported to be. I know what he wanted and espoused, but he did the exact opposite. I gave you the facts and stats of his tenure yet you keep trying to redefine what left of centre is. If Reagan was on the right with his policies then left must have been communism by your definition. Any idiot who thinks Reagan did what he did because it was "right" should be sold some magic beans. That's the same reason Bush has to shit on free market principles to save the free market. Don't make me laugh. Next you'll tell me he was a "Friedmanian" too haha.
Nah, you’re a moron. Keep banging your head against the wall, the fact remains that in these here States Reagan is known as the father of what is now called the neo-conservatism and no amount of bullshitting or incorrect spelling of the word “center”
)) is going to change that. A word of advice: if they ever let you into this country, make sure you don’t call Reagan a Socialist as they’ll first laugh their asses off and then send you back to Tasmania for fear of spreading Mad Cow Disease
Saying "he didn't follow it to a T" is about the stupidest statement I've heard. He did the complete opposite on most things. Haha, but you don't know what you're talking about since you didn't know that the Chicago school existed until I told you it did.
Whereas the crap that comes out of your mouth is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard! But, it’s OK koochooloo, go around calling Reagan a Socialist! LMAO!
LOL, I don't care what you call me sunshine. You keep humiliating yourself and flail with insults to save face. It isn't working.
Nah, I’m good. But, yeah, having hissy fits about Reagan being a Socialist doesn’t humiliate your ass. LOL!
You keep calling Reagan a "Friedmanian", but you're too stupid to wiki that he was actually a follower of the Austrian school. Austrian school =/= Chicago school. The Austrians, at the time - the article I linked you was a contemporary one - were shitting on him for not following through. The facet the two schools did agree with in large part is free markets and smaller government; so you making that mistake is predictable - you're learning as you go. BTW, the Austrian school was more prevalent and an older school than Chicago. Only your dumbass is revising history to call Reagan a "Friedmanian" LOL
Your ass is so stupid that you don’t even follow your own advice. Here’s what Wikipedia has to say about Supply Side Economics. Open your eyes, shut your well-worn mouth, and learn:
“Supply-side economics developed during the 1970s in response to Keynesian economic policy, and in particular the failure of demand management to stabilize Western economies during the stagflation of the 1970s, in the wake of the oil crisis in 1973. It drew on a range of non-Keynesian economic thought, particularly the Chicago School and Neo-Classical School. An advocate of supply-side economics traced the school of thought's intellectual descent from the philosophers Ibn Khaldun and David Hume, satirist Jonathan Swift, political economist Adam Smith, and even Founding Father Alexander Hamilton.”
The dumbest thing about your whole rant is that you are crapping on Reagonomics when it is essentially the position the left currently hold today. How stupid could you be to contradict yourself so many times? This is turning into some sick joke. Either you're bi-polar or have a masochistic personality disorder. No one can possibly be this dense.
Bingo! The stupid child finally sees the light, even if yelling, scratching, and screaming the whole way!
The point, shmuck, is this: the US political discourse has been dragged to the right for over three decades now. Reagan started it all and now it’s so bad that Obama passes as a “leftist,” where in reality he’d be, at best, considered center right anywhere else.
Even though it's already been established that you're dense in the head, do you get it now dummy?
You're not on my level. I've humiliated you several times over here whilst teaching you about the very things you're trying to argue against. You got so flustered with the name-calling I stopped so you don't have a heart-attack. As I said, bone up on your wiki education so you stop contradicting your own dumbass arguments. That way you'll start being taken seriously. From Einstein's theories just being theories, to not being able to cite an article against BT and IZ's contentions, to not knowing there is a Chicago school of economics, to citing a religious professor to argue against the greatest economic mind of the 20th century...yet your dumbass doesn't get the hint that we are laughing at you...chill out old-timer, you've already lost.
LOL! You just got your ass handed to you more than once in this very post and you’re still barking. If nothing else, you’re tenacious.
From trying to change my argument to something else, to seeking help from bullshit books, to asking for aid from your patron saint of hypocrisy, all your attempts at trying to sound intelligent have failed. Then again, your credibility on this board always was a big fat zero. Do some more weekend-cramming before trying to take me on kiddo. Remember what I told you about punks like you and mincemeat!