اسلام نبوی، : بکن بکن محمد

IEI

Administrator
Staff member
Nov 10, 2002
14,508
3,343
#2
couldn't believe my ears -- wow
look at the other -- watching it like bunch of goats --
 
Last edited:
Feb 22, 2005
6,884
9
#3
He is telling the real story of Muhamad. He used his religion to dominate women and have sex and force into sex. This is the Allah that so many Iranians blindly follow.
 
Dec 12, 2002
8,517
1
usa
#5
please ,don't be surprized if you have not done it then you think it is wierd .
that's why they say ; you don't know unless you try it .
if some day i travel to the part of the world which one can access to camel ( rent one ) and see what will happen .
it is human nature quick to judge .
 

Ardesheer

Bench Warmer
Jun 30, 2005
1,580
1
#6
This is from the mouth of a Mohammad follower, and refers to Ravayat from both Sunni and Shia books. Now, if we say these things and recite the facts, we are accused of insulting a religion. I said it before, this whole thing is an insult to humanity. There is so much to be disgusted with in this story. Even 1,400 years later, these guys see nothing wrong with the story and repeat it as a complement to their Prophet. He believed in his Allah's heaven so much that he could not wait to get there to have sex forever. He had the right to have sex with a slave, or another human being that Allah created as a slave to another, and in his wife's bed.

The other day, someone here was talking about the true Shiaism. Baba, the foundation is so f*** up that you need to wake and see what they have been feeding you for 1,400 years. How dumb can people be? After hearing this story, how could any woman call herself a Muslim.
 
Feb 22, 2005
6,884
9
#7
Brainwash and fear make the women follow it. And Funny, they are some of the most fundamentalist supporters. They learn not to question it as it is Allah's decision. However, these women probably dont see themselves as one of the 72 or more given to men as slaves in heaven. Rather, there is a section for them away from all the other women.

This is from the mouth of a Mohammad follower, and refers to Ravayat from both Sunni and Shia books. Now, if we say these things and recite the facts, we are accused of insulting a religion. I said it before, this whole thing is an insult to humanity. There is so much to be disgusted with in this story. Even 1,400 years later, these guys see nothing wrong with the story and repeat it as a complement to their Prophet. He believed in his Allah's heaven so much that he could not wait to get there to have sex forever. He had the right to have sex with a slave, or another human being that Allah created as a slave to another, and in his wife's bed.

The other day, someone here was talking about the true Shiaism. Baba, the foundation is so f*** up that you need to wake and see what they have been feeding you for 1,400 years. How dumb can people be? After hearing this story, how could any woman call herself a Muslim.
 
May 21, 2003
19,849
147
Not The Eshaalic Goozpublic !
#8
حالا ما این را با خنده بر گذار میکنیم ولی در ریشه این حرف ها رفتن خیلی مهمه
این دیوس هزار پدری که معلوم نیست ننه اش با چی جفت گیری کرده که این به دنیا آمده داره به طور غیره مستقیم به مردم میگه که ممد کاروان زن که یعنی آخوند زمان حال میتونه هر گهی دلش میخواهد بخوره و مردم هم باید خفه شن و هیچی نگن
این دیوس داره پایه های فاحشه شدن تمام کشور رو میریزه و گوسفند ها هم به به میکنند
 

khodam

Bench Warmer
Oct 18, 2002
2,458
88
Atlanta
#9
The sad part really isn't that this happened 1400 years ago, it probably wasn't out of norm back then. The sad part in that this guy is telling this on TV in 21st century as if there's nothing wrong with that.
 
May 21, 2003
19,849
147
Not The Eshaalic Goozpublic !
#11
The sad part really isn't that this happened 1400 years ago, it probably wasn't out of norm back then. The sad part in that this guy is telling this on TV in 21st century as if there's nothing wrong with that.
wasn't out of norm back then in THE ARABIAN PENINSULA, certainly not in the persian empire and not in the roman empire.

Romans did have sexual relations with their slaves (male and female) but officially they had only one wife. This cock suckers main point of life was to tend to their digestive and sexual organs. I guess nothing has changed there, these shit bags are still the same.
 
Feb 22, 2005
6,884
9
#12
Alexander did have several wives and his wives would get jeoulous like Muhamad. Difference is:

Alexander was a warrior but Muhamad calls himself prophet of the creator of the universe. Fact is he was just another human being warrior who killed for power, took many wives, slept with a 9 years old. However, somehow, muslims are willing to worship him regardless of who he was and what he did.

wasn't out of norm back then in THE ARABIAN PENINSULA, certainly not in the persian empire and not in the roman empire.

Romans did have sexual relations with their slaves (male and female) but officially they had only one wife. This cock suckers main point of life was to tend to their digestive and sexual organs. I guess nothing has changed there, these shit bags are still the same.
 
#13
حالا ما این را با خنده بر گذار میکنیم ولی در ریشه این حرف ها رفتن خیلی مهمه
این دیوس هزار پدری که معلوم نیست ننه اش با چی جفت گیری کرده که این به دنیا آمده داره به طور غیره مستقیم به مردم میگه که ممد کاروان زن که یعنی آخوند زمان حال میتونه هر گهی دلش میخواهد بخوره و مردم هم باید خفه شن و هیچی نگن
این دیوس داره پایه های فاحشه شدن تمام کشور رو میریزه و گوسفند ها هم به به میکنند
18 +

این هم یک فیلم از این آخوندهای مادر به خطا که داره کار پیغمبر اسلام رو میکنه


http://freedomvatan.blogspot.com/2008/11/blog-post.html
 

payan

Captain
Dec 12, 2002
8,517
1
usa
#14
common guys ,that was porno movie. , the woman from the begining looked at the camera .and that akhound real looks like akhound porno star .
they tried stay at the zoom of camera all the times .
that video probably is one of the best selling porno film for akhounds in iran . because the ones they made outside of iran mostly look faked .
i have no doubt it was porno video .
over all it was ugly to me .
 
May 21, 2003
19,849
147
Not The Eshaalic Goozpublic !
#15
Alexander did have several wives and his wives would get jeoulous like Muhamad. Difference is:

Alexander was a warrior but Muhamad calls himself prophet of the creator of the universe. Fact is he was just another human being warrior who killed for power, took many wives, slept with a 9 years old. However, somehow, muslims are willing to worship him regardless of who he was and what he did.
name Alexander the greats official wives ? lawful wives?

I don't mean people that cursed murderer raped.

please enlighten us by the macedonian civil law at the time of achamenids empire that allowed many wives?
as you know it was the law and it is still within the laws of islamic countries to penetrate many women at the same time.
 

payan

Captain
Dec 12, 2002
8,517
1
usa
#16
dear keyvan pars ,you give those akhound too much credit .i really doubt in intire their life they hardly even had sex .just could here,there when they were in feyziye .
the guys just talk .while back we had this guy constantley came to work and talk about the sex he had with his woman .i was real surprized how is it possible one person shared his private life with evey one .as a matter a fact his wife was very nice and attractive, but later on we found that guy actually had more interests inguys ...begzarim .
 
May 21, 2003
19,849
147
Not The Eshaalic Goozpublic !
#17
dear keyvan pars ,you give those akhound too much credit .i really doubt in intire their life they hardly even had sex .just could here,there when they were in feyziye .
the guys just talk .while back we had this guy constantley came to work and talk about the sex he had with his woman .i was real surprized how is it possible one person shared his private life with evey one .as a matter a fact his wife was very nice and attractive, but later on we found that guy actually had more interests inguys ...begzarim .
the whole life of akhound revolves around shekam and zir e shekam.
Akhounds have been raping and seducing women in iran for the last 400 years. In many cases in the past they have gotten away with it due to their placement in rural society(representatives of the arab mohamad) and due to the shame the women would face (and possibly vengeance by their husbands/fathers/brothers) from exposing them.

In more populated areas though during shah's time akhounds hands were cut off so they kept content with raping younger akhounds in the muslim seminary schools. but now it seems like it is open season for them to do whatever the hell they want.
 

Iran#1

Bench Warmer
Oct 19, 2002
1,411
0
Montreal
#18
soreye Ahzab:
پيامبر ما براى تو آن همسرانى را كه مهرشان را دادهاى حلال كرديم و [كنيزانى] را كه خدا از غنيمت جنگى در اختيار تو قرار داده و دختران عمويت و دختران عمههايت و دختران دايى تو و دختران خالههايت كه با تو مهاجرت كردهاند و زن مؤمنى كه خود را [داوطلبانه] به پيامبر ببخشددر صورتى كه پيامبر بخواهد او را به زنى گيرد [اين ازدواج از روى بخشش] ويژه توست نه ديگر مؤمنان ما نيك مىدانيم كه در مورد زنان و كنيزانشان چه بر آنان مقرر كردهايم تا براى تو مشكلى پيش نيايد و خدا همواره آمرزنده مهربان است (۵۰)

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ إِنَّا أَحْلَلْنَا لَكَ أَزْوَاجَكَ اللَّاتِي آتَيْتَ أُجُورَهُنَّ وَمَا مَلَكَتْ يَمِينُكَ مِمَّا أَفَاء اللَّهُ عَلَيْكَ وَبَنَاتِ عَمِّكَ وَبَنَاتِ عَمَّاتِكَ وَبَنَاتِ خَالِكَ وَبَنَاتِ خَالَاتِكَ اللَّاتِي هَاجَرْنَ مَعَكَ وَامْرَأَةً مُّؤْمِنَةً إِن وَهَبَتْ نَفْسَهَا لِلنَّبِيِّ إِنْ أَرَادَ النَّبِيُّ أَن يَسْتَنكِحَهَا خَالِصَةً لَّكَ مِن دُونِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ قَدْ عَلِمْنَا مَا فَرَضْنَا عَلَيْهِمْ فِي أَزْوَاجِهِمْ وَمَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُمْ لِكَيْلَا يَكُونَ عَلَيْكَ حَرَجٌ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا ﴿۵۰﴾

نوبت هر كدام از آن زنها را كه مىخواهى به تاخير انداز و هر كدام را كه مىخواهى پيش خود جاى ده و بر تو باكى نيست كه هر كدام را كه ترك كردهاى [دوباره] طلب كنى اين نزديكتر است براى اينكه چشمانشان روشن گردد و دلتنگ نشوند و همگىشان به آنچه به آنان دادهاى خشنود گردند و آنچه در دلهاى شماستخدا مىداند و خدا همواره داناى بردبار است (۵۱)

تُرْجِي مَن تَشَاء مِنْهُنَّ وَتُؤْوِي إِلَيْكَ مَن تَشَاء وَمَنِ ابْتَغَيْتَ مِمَّنْ عَزَلْتَ فَلَا جُنَاحَ عَلَيْكَ ذَلِكَ أَدْنَى أَن تَقَرَّ أَعْيُنُهُنَّ وَلَا يَحْزَنَّ وَيَرْضَيْنَ بِمَا آتَيْتَهُنَّ كُلُّهُنَّ وَاللَّهُ يَعْلَمُ مَا فِي قُلُوبِكُمْ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ عَلِيمًا حَلِيمًا ﴿۵۱﴾

از اين پس ديگر [گرفتن] زنان و نيز اينكه به جاى آنان زنان ديگرى بر تو حلال نيست هر چند زيبايى آنها براى تو مورد پسند افتد به استثناى كنيزان و خدا همواره بر هر چيزى مراقب است (۵2



و آنگاه كه به كسى كه خدا بر او نعمت ارزانى داشته بود و تو [نيز] به او نعمت داده بودى مىگفتى همسرت را پيش خود نگاه دار و از خدا پروا بدار و آنچه را كه خدا آشكاركننده آن بود در دل خود نهان مىكردى و از مردم مىترسيدى با آنكه خدا سزاوارتر بود كه از او بترسى پس چون زيد از آن [زن] كام برگرفت [و او را ترك گفت] وى را به نكاح تو درآورديم تا [در آينده] در مورد ازدواج مؤمنان با زنان پسرخواندگانشان چون آنان را طلاق گفتند گناهى نباشد و فرمان خدا صورت اجرا پذيرد (۳۷)
 

Ardesheer

Bench Warmer
Jun 30, 2005
1,580
1
#19
^^^ What's more amazing is that people believe these are the words of God and Quran is from God. It is so childish to say these things and also insane. Even back then many people laughed at Mohammad and his wives did not believe him either. He could not wait to go to heaven to have sex with everyone, but he was give cart blanc to do everyone he pleased here, even his sex "slaves". At the end, don't take these as insults, because they are facts, just open Quran and read it.