⚽ Article off Athletic which is pay-based service
⚽ What can Arab money & shady businesses be punished for?
PL started to look into hacked emails in December 2018, went as far back as 2009 and took four years to complete its findings. City could also get sued ( 105 different PL charges the club face) by clubs left and right if convicted of charges. From Mancini to current director and Chairman could be charged.
The potential punishments are outlined in rule W.51 of the Premier League’s handbook, with a range of potential options for the panel to consider if City are found to have broken the rules.
Sanctions range from a reprimand and fines to points deductions — and even expulsion from the Premier League
City will not be able to appeal to that court, though, which is something they did successfully in their case against UEFA.
The reason they can’t appeal to CAS is because the Switzerland-based court does not have jurisdiction over this English arbitration process.
Given the Premier League’s investigation into City took more than four years, it is unlikely the independent panel will come to a conclusion in the near future. This has the potential to take months.
.
Man City charges explained: The accusations, possible punishments and what happens next
Matt Slater, Dan Sheldon and more
Feb 7, 2023
The various debates surrounding Manchester City took an abrupt turn shortly after 10am (GMT) on Monday.
Conversations over the breakfast table had been about how the world’s most potent striker might have made the team worse, did Joao Cancelo really have to go for getting the hump at being dropped or why Pep Guardiola was moaning about the Manchester to London commute now.
But as work started, lessons commenced and daytime TV was switched on, the talk took a rather more serious tone.
Suddenly, everyone was reaching for their copy of the Premier League handbook, arguing about whether Saracens, Lance Armstrong or Juventus was a better precedent for what might happen next, and quoting legal opinions about statutes of limitations.
If consensus has emerged, it is that the Premier League’s decision to hit Manchester City with more than 100 financial fair play-related charges is unprecedented, surprising and potentially transformative in terms of the football landscape.
Here, The Athletic sets out what has happened, why it has happened now and where this goes next.
⚽ What have Manchester City been accused of?
The Premier League announced the extraordinary news in a 736-word statement — published without fanfare on its website and listed below articles on Harry Kane, Sean Dyche and Fantasy Premier League tips — which revealed City have been “referred to an independent commission” over the alleged rule-breaking.
This relates to a series of alleged breaches of financial rules between the 2009-10 and 2017-18 seasons.
City are accused by the Premier League of not providing accurate financial information, “in particular with respect to its revenue (including sponsorship revenue), its related parties and its operating costs”.
The club are also accused of not fully disclosing managerial remuneration for a four-year period. These related to the 2009-10 to 2012-13 seasons, when Roberto Mancini was in charge.
They also stand accused of breaching Premier League rules on profit and sustainability in 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18.
go-deeper
GO DEEPER
The Premier League’s Manchester City statement — a line-by-line annotation
The Premier League has additionally alleged City did not comply with UEFA’s regulations around club licensing and financial fair play in 2013-14 and between 2014-15 and 2017-18.
City were banned from European competitions for two years by UEFA for alleged breaches of its FFP regulations in February 2020. The sanction was overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in July of the same year, however.
Roberto Mancini led Manchester City to their first Premier League title in 2011-12 (Photo: Michael Regan – The FA/The FA via Getty Images)
⚽ What have Manchester City said?
City expressed their “surprise” at the Premier League’s charges and pushed back against claims they had failed to cooperate fully with the investigation.
A club statement read: “Manchester City FC is surprised by the issuing of these alleged breaches of the Premier League Rules, particularly given the extensive engagement and vast amount of detailed materials that the EPL has been provided with.
“The club welcomes the review of this matter by an independent commission, to impartially consider the comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence that exists in support of its position.
“As such, we look forward to this matter being put to rest once and for all.”
City are determined to defend themselves against the allegations and are confident of doing so.
Club officials only learned of the charges on Monday morning in a call with the Premier League, which was still ongoing when the news broke.
City also noted the timing of the Premier League’s announcement and believe it was linked to the planned white paper on football governance, which was due to be released this week.
That has now been pushed back, but City believe the Premier League used its intended release as an opportunity to demonstrate that it can govern amid calls for an independent regulator (more on that below).
City successfully appealed against UEFA’s two-year Champions League ban at CAS in 2020, when the court ruled “most of the alleged breaches were either not established or time-barred”.
Coverage of the Man City allegations on The Athletic…
The Premier League’s Manchester City statement — a line-by-line annotation
Premier League accuses Man City of alleged financial breaches
There are no such time-barring restrictions on the Premier League’s investigation, but City believe they would have won the case against UEFA regardless and therefore welcome what they believe is a chance to fully clear their name.
Pep Guardiola is expected to speak about the charges for the first time on Friday, in his pre-match press conference for Sunday’s Premier League home game against Aston Villa.
⚽ part 1/3
⚽ What can Arab money & shady businesses be punished for?
PL started to look into hacked emails in December 2018, went as far back as 2009 and took four years to complete its findings. City could also get sued ( 105 different PL charges the club face) by clubs left and right if convicted of charges. From Mancini to current director and Chairman could be charged.
The potential punishments are outlined in rule W.51 of the Premier League’s handbook, with a range of potential options for the panel to consider if City are found to have broken the rules.
Sanctions range from a reprimand and fines to points deductions — and even expulsion from the Premier League
City will not be able to appeal to that court, though, which is something they did successfully in their case against UEFA.
The reason they can’t appeal to CAS is because the Switzerland-based court does not have jurisdiction over this English arbitration process.
Given the Premier League’s investigation into City took more than four years, it is unlikely the independent panel will come to a conclusion in the near future. This has the potential to take months.
.
Man City charges explained: The accusations, possible punishments and what happens next
Matt Slater, Dan Sheldon and more
Feb 7, 2023
The various debates surrounding Manchester City took an abrupt turn shortly after 10am (GMT) on Monday.
Conversations over the breakfast table had been about how the world’s most potent striker might have made the team worse, did Joao Cancelo really have to go for getting the hump at being dropped or why Pep Guardiola was moaning about the Manchester to London commute now.
But as work started, lessons commenced and daytime TV was switched on, the talk took a rather more serious tone.
Suddenly, everyone was reaching for their copy of the Premier League handbook, arguing about whether Saracens, Lance Armstrong or Juventus was a better precedent for what might happen next, and quoting legal opinions about statutes of limitations.
If consensus has emerged, it is that the Premier League’s decision to hit Manchester City with more than 100 financial fair play-related charges is unprecedented, surprising and potentially transformative in terms of the football landscape.
Here, The Athletic sets out what has happened, why it has happened now and where this goes next.
⚽ What have Manchester City been accused of?
The Premier League announced the extraordinary news in a 736-word statement — published without fanfare on its website and listed below articles on Harry Kane, Sean Dyche and Fantasy Premier League tips — which revealed City have been “referred to an independent commission” over the alleged rule-breaking.
This relates to a series of alleged breaches of financial rules between the 2009-10 and 2017-18 seasons.
City are accused by the Premier League of not providing accurate financial information, “in particular with respect to its revenue (including sponsorship revenue), its related parties and its operating costs”.
The club are also accused of not fully disclosing managerial remuneration for a four-year period. These related to the 2009-10 to 2012-13 seasons, when Roberto Mancini was in charge.
They also stand accused of breaching Premier League rules on profit and sustainability in 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18.
go-deeper
GO DEEPER
The Premier League’s Manchester City statement — a line-by-line annotation
The Premier League has additionally alleged City did not comply with UEFA’s regulations around club licensing and financial fair play in 2013-14 and between 2014-15 and 2017-18.
City were banned from European competitions for two years by UEFA for alleged breaches of its FFP regulations in February 2020. The sanction was overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in July of the same year, however.
Roberto Mancini led Manchester City to their first Premier League title in 2011-12 (Photo: Michael Regan – The FA/The FA via Getty Images)
⚽ What have Manchester City said?
City expressed their “surprise” at the Premier League’s charges and pushed back against claims they had failed to cooperate fully with the investigation.
A club statement read: “Manchester City FC is surprised by the issuing of these alleged breaches of the Premier League Rules, particularly given the extensive engagement and vast amount of detailed materials that the EPL has been provided with.
“The club welcomes the review of this matter by an independent commission, to impartially consider the comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence that exists in support of its position.
“As such, we look forward to this matter being put to rest once and for all.”
City are determined to defend themselves against the allegations and are confident of doing so.
Club officials only learned of the charges on Monday morning in a call with the Premier League, which was still ongoing when the news broke.
City also noted the timing of the Premier League’s announcement and believe it was linked to the planned white paper on football governance, which was due to be released this week.
That has now been pushed back, but City believe the Premier League used its intended release as an opportunity to demonstrate that it can govern amid calls for an independent regulator (more on that below).
City successfully appealed against UEFA’s two-year Champions League ban at CAS in 2020, when the court ruled “most of the alleged breaches were either not established or time-barred”.
Coverage of the Man City allegations on The Athletic…
The Premier League’s Manchester City statement — a line-by-line annotation
Premier League accuses Man City of alleged financial breaches
There are no such time-barring restrictions on the Premier League’s investigation, but City believe they would have won the case against UEFA regardless and therefore welcome what they believe is a chance to fully clear their name.
Pep Guardiola is expected to speak about the charges for the first time on Friday, in his pre-match press conference for Sunday’s Premier League home game against Aston Villa.
⚽ part 1/3
Last edited: