I hope the players, all of them, do very well for the sake of team melli, including the ones who don't deserve to be in the field, and looks like they will be playing as main players in the WC, even though they may give their 100%.
Tactics is a big word, and by just by mentioning this word, it does not cover up for the incompetence of the coach, nothing against the specific players, as I know they want the best for the team and I respect them, it's the coach who is responsible for the team line-up, and including, team tactics. Generally speaking, in any team it's better to put a player who may be more effective in any certain position (though that player may only give 80%), vs. a player who has been tested many times and is shown to be weak (though that player might give his 100%). I hope those specific players have become better, and will therefore do better in the world cup, than their past performances (which was in front of much weaker teams, than Portugal,Mexico, and Angola). On Mahdavikia, he was only giving 50% in certain games in the past and should have been subbed by another player, for there were players who would be more effective than a Mahdavikia at 50%. Baazeekonaanee hastand ke be maraateb as defaa-e chap baa nam-e khaaneveedegee-e noon (hataa agar dar 80% talaash baazee konand) mo-ass-ertarand, taa noon baa 100% talaashesh, magar eenkeh noon baazeesh behtar shod-e baasheh, ke man yekee do-aa meekonam eentor baash-e. Agar tarafdaar-e teem melee hastee, lotfan esm-e doostemoono eenhame be engeleesee be esm nayaar (nanevees). Chon hameentor ke hast, agar aghaayoon do-taa baazee-haay-e gozashteye teem melee ro bebeenand, takeed va defaa-e shomaa az noon be aanhaa komak meekonad (na baray-e yek nafar mesl-e C. Ronaldo va teemee mesl-e Portaaghaal, balke baray-e oon do-taa teem-e deege, ke tasmeem begeerand hamalaat-e beeshtar-ee az oon jenaah bezaaran).