clear 3rd world mentality on display in response to my post.
the point is not if she went postal because she was bahai
or jew the point is that info about her was not publicized
by the government owned persian media in the uk and the
usa(bbc,voa).also the bahai themselves go out o f their way
to publicize their identity when they 'achieve' something but
when one of them does a crime,as the one who killed the titan qb,
or this woman they just shut up and don't even want to talk about it.
that's the issue the guy in that clip is talking about.
and as usual you go labeling him an iri tool,etc. just because he
says something that does not conform to your deficient view of the
world.name calling is easy i an call a whole bunch of posters here as
mek, cia or mossad tool but i won't since i don't label people.
Dude, I am guilty as charged, born and raised in a third world country.
Al thought I have been trying to improve myself, perhaps my 3rd world language is the barrier to get my message to you regarding why it is improper and misplaced to judge her action by her religion and belief system (which has nothing to do with what I think of Dana).
The reasoning both you and he are providing to counter what other media outlet has been doing in labeling activists based on their field of interest and activity is very wrong as I mentioned in my previous post (even mentioning the time of clip where he starts to talk about it) and why it is not wrong to refer someone with their field activity, as activists are often get called: animal activists, human rights activists, labor activists, children rights activists, women's right activists, and on the same token activists focused on ethnic issues are referred as such: Kurdish activists, Arab activists, etc ... (it is the same way you address scientists, they are all considered scientists but they are identified further by their field of research and interest) ... now that's not the same as using religion to label someone when their action is not the result of their practice or belief in that thought system.
So please take out your first world glasses off and read my first reply to you again and see how Dana is using an invalid argument to justify his action and stand, and how flawed his logic and argument is.
My labeling of Dana has nothing to with my argument and objection to labeling Nasim's action based on her religion as you and Dana have done.
As you note if you look again, I shared my direct observation of him - as being a tool - in my next post while exchanging with AK8 and not in response to the argument with you.
I believe he is knowingly manipulating the facts and twisting the truth to spread misinformation, and in the process make some noise and attract some interest to gain fame and find often simple minded and gullible followers and fans at the expense of discrediting opposition further and create division among segments of it, resulting in disappointment and distrust of people in opposition.
Hence I call him zed-Omid-e Na-Dana and label him as a tool of IRI.
I hope you do not take this personally and look beyond the political side of things and read my first post again.