Shooting in Iran's parliament and in Khomeini's mausoleum

Zob Ahan

Elite Member
Feb 4, 2005
17,481
2,233
#61
as the infamous iranian-american rebel said
"image is everything".
this little clinical hit projects the right image at
the right time for iran.
none of the so called 'western' leaders,not even trump,condemn it.
it was a hit with them too.


Perhaps this is why they didn't condemn it:



Iran's missile attack on Islamic State targets in Syria on Sunday was by all accounts, a resounding failure. Of the seven missiles fired at the ISIS-held Syrian town of Deir el-Zour, only two were reported to have reached their target.
Three of the rockets fell outside Syrian territory, in Iraq, while the remaining two fell somewhere inside Syria, missing their targets by many kilometers.


Iran used seven ground-to-ground mid-range Zulfiqar missiles. These new missiles were considered to be extremely accurate. Furthermore, while the possible firing range of the missiles is thought to extend to between seven hundred and eight hundred kilometers, Sunday's missiles only travelled four-hundred-and-fifty kilometers to their targets.
Israeli military sources told Haaretz that the operational results of the Iranian missile attack was "a great deal less impressive than the media noise being made in Iran around the launch."
 
Oct 16, 2002
39,533
1,513
DarvAze DoolAb
www.iransportspress.com
#62
Perhaps this is why they didn't condemn it:



Iran's missile attack on Islamic State targets in Syria on Sunday was by all accounts, a resounding failure. Of the seven missiles fired at the ISIS-held Syrian town of Deir el-Zour, only two were reported to have reached their target.
Three of the rockets fell outside Syrian territory, in Iraq, while the remaining two fell somewhere inside Syria, missing their targets by many kilometers.


Iran used seven ground-to-ground mid-range Zulfiqar missiles. These new missiles were considered to be extremely accurate. Furthermore, while the possible firing range of the missiles is thought to extend to between seven hundred and eight hundred kilometers, Sunday's missiles only travelled four-hundred-and-fifty kilometers to their targets.
Israeli military sources told Haaretz that the operational results of the Iranian missile attack was "a great deal less impressive than the media noise being made in Iran around the launch."
2/7 = 28.5% accuracy (if the 2 indeed hit their target). I guess that's better than 0%

That whole terror show and shooting incident was to get Sepah some money and PR time. Not a bad business move, but innocent people lost their lives.
 
May 9, 2004
15,168
179
#63
همین هارتس نبود که گفت
میمون ایرانی با خال رفت و بی خال برگشت واینکه فرستادن میمون به فضا با شکست مواجه شد ؟!!ا
بعدا موشکی که به این دقیقی یک نقطه ای رو بزنه بعیده که همان نوع موشک دویست کیلومتر اشتباه داشته باشه
نکته مهم دیگر انکه
اگر فقط دو موشک به هدف خورده بودند ایران حداقل می توانست اعلان کند که دو یا سه موشک پرتاب کرده چون
سقوط موشک در عراق و سوریه با این جنگی که در انجا هست را می توان سرپوش گذاشت
همچنین اگر تصویری از موشکهای سقوط شده بر عراق بود میشد باور کرد ولی به این شکل
همان جریان میمون خالدار و بی خال است که هارتس میخواست به ما بقبولانه که فرستادن میمون انجام نشده
در صورتی که بعد از چند هفته ویدئو کامل انرا دیدم و هارتس دروغگو در امد
لبته در مورد ارکیو 170 هم همین چرت و پرتها را گفت
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Oct 18, 2010
6,271
849
#64
this is fake news from the phony media if there ever was one:

Israeli military sources told Haaretz that the operational results of the Iranian missile attack was "a great deal less impressive than the media noise being made in Iran around the launch."

that's the only line in the entire article that means anything and it offers no proof whatsoever
for their claim.let's see proof of the missiles landing in iraq as they claim.that's easy to prove.
quoting unnamed military sources from the apartheid regime in isreal which is a sworn enemy
of iran and iranian people as evidence is suspect even if they had any proofs.
did pentgon have anything to say on the direct hits or lack of them?
right now the proof is in seeing the direct hits on the released drone footage.
i see at least 4 direct hits and one is a cruise missile because of it's shallow angle of approach.

[video=youtube;p2SYfIoknyo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2SYfIoknyo[/video]
 
May 9, 2004
15,168
179
#66
اصولا این نوع موشکهای دور برد و با برد متوسط با جدا شدن بدنه از سر جنگی موشک همراه است
یعنی بدنه ممکن روی عراق یا حتی ایران جدا شود ولی سر موشک که به طرف هدف شلیک میشود بسیار دقیق عمل می کند
و ضریب خطای بسیار کمی دارد
اسرائیلی ها صد در صد این را می دانند ولی شاید می خواهند این قسمتی را که حالا در جایی رها شده را کل موشک بدانند
و کارایی موشک های دور برد و برد متوسط ایران را برای یکعده که این موضوع را نمی دانند زیر سئوال ببرند
همانطور که گفتم جریان میمون بی خال و با خال و ارکیو 170 را هم همین هارتس اول بیان کرد و همه می دانند چه افتضاحی به با اوردند وقتی
که ایران ویدئو کامل را نشان داد