So now the reason you aren't going to make a point is because there are more important, irrelevant, points to make. Hilarious.
Nah, I'm good. I have the wherewithal to continue a debate once I enter it. I don't avoid the issue, like some special-ed teacher.
He uses scholarly methods, just as I refter to scholarly studies. But if we use your dumbass logic, he can't possibly look at the facts and stats because he didn't live in other countries. I mean, if you had any credibility you just lost it here.
So you're that moron, we know.
Krugman and Reich over Friedman?....Hahahahahahaha please, for your own sake, stop embarrassing yourself. Stick to one subject you know nothing about.
Everyone with higher education knows the methodologies and flaws of formal research, and they're pretty obvious in a social science sphere, but you didn't even cite one study that in your opinion was flawed.
All you did to deflect attention was to say "well, studies can be done this way and that way and they can be flawed". Congrats genius, but considering the consensus on this risk factor in terms of determining deviant behaviour, which study are you actually referring to? It takes the height of cockiness and ignorance to start talking about something you actually have no clue about.
We're still waiting for you to cite a study you disagree with. My chef could probably cite an article given this much time. Your dumbass is still avoiding the debate.
Moron, no one said single-parenthood guarantees deviant behaviour. That's the kind of statement Niloufar would make. It is that there is a far higher prevalence in comparison to families with both the mother and father. In fact, there are studies undertaken amongst even those who had single-parents which show those who had a whole family intact for longer were less likely to go towards deviant behaviour than those who had less time. There are studies with controls as well, like the wealth of the family being taken into account. The same thing tends to pop up: single-parenthood making a big difference in terms of determining deviant behaviour.
And you did address me in the same post you addressed BT. Or is your memory fading with your intellect?
It's too easy to make you look like a dimwit, I'm just smarter than you.
Haha, you're really putting me in my place by avoiding the issue and making yourself look like a dumbass. Listen, you keep posting and I'll keep shitting on you. It might get tedious for the others, but not for me.
Criticising? Calling half your country with right leanings xenophobic is criticising? Haha, look, you outed yourself. At least own it. Wave that flag proudly; just don't have any pretense of being evenhanded. Or being intelligent. We all know you're not now.
You’re about as dumb as a doorknob and I like fu*king with you.
Last edited: