Which part of my post are you not agreeing with?
Let me try this again. If New Zealand beats Peru, a high seeded team gets knocked out. That means we move one rank up among the teams that qualify for the WC
If you disagree, or even if I am wrong, then respond politely and respectfully, and explain why what I wrote is wrong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Let me try this again. If New Zealand beats Peru, a high seeded team gets knocked out. That means we move one rank up among the teams that qualify for the WC
If you disagree, or even if I am wrong, then respond politely and respectfully, and explain why what I wrote is wrong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The part I disagrre was highlighted in bold
"If Greece beats whoever their opponents will be, they will replace a higher ranked team."
What I understood was If greece (35) beats Denmark (25), greece (now 25) will replace denmark (now 35)
Which is nonsens = Jafangiyat