And pretzels make me thirsty....
Alright, drink some doogh.
How is it funny? Conservatives themselves make it a point to support the Isreali cause. Why would they attack that aspect of Obama's campaign when it is something they run on, blatantly, themselves? In their eyes it would be akin to saying: "look, that guy is so smart". It would be a compliment.
The truth is, as we all know from his speeches (which curiously don't seem to apply here
) he supports lobbyists AIPAC, who in turn support Isreal, and which is the same country Obama has revealed his vested interest in.
And then, yet, you come here saying in 98 he met Said and somehow he is sympathetic to their cause? LOL you know what is REALLY funny? That the link you sourced is about how Obama flip-flops. That Ali Abunimah gives an example where he promised to talk about the Palestinian but didn't and said:
"Hey, I'm sorry I haven't said more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race. I'm hoping when things calm down I can be more up front." I hope you know what that means...
Of course, the blogger here is right to insinuate that Obama flip-flopped. Met with Said in 98 and kissed AIPAC's ass just recently.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cOJNC2EuJw"]YouTube - Barack Obama at AIPAC[/ame]
Or that you think because Khalidi held a fundraiser for Obama that means he really
is sympathetic.
"During documented speeches and public events, Khalidi has called Israel an "apartheid system in creation" and a destructive "racist" state."
Oh, I'm surrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre he is sympathetic to their/Khalidi's cause. Wait, let me watch that video again...or read a transcript:
Obama said:
But if anyone has been confused by these e-mails, I want you to know that today I'll be speaking from my heart, and as a true friend of Israel. And I know that when I visit with AIPAC, I am among friends. Good friends. Friends who share my strong commitment to make sure that the bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable today, tomorrow and forever.
...
The question is how to move forward. There are those who would continue and intensify this failed status quo, ignoring eight years of accumulated evidence that our foreign policy is dangerously flawed. And then there are those who would lay all of the problems of the Middle East at the doorstep of Israel and its supporters, as if the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the root of all trouble in the region. These voices blame the Middle East's only democracy for the region's extremism. They offer the false promise that abandoning a stalwart ally is somehow the path to strength. It is not, it never has been, and it never will be.
Our alliance is based on shared interests and shared values. Those who threaten Israel threaten us. Israel has always faced these threats on the front lines. And I will bring to the White House an unshakeable commitment to Israel's security.
And this is my original gripe with this fantasist idea that Obama is going to change something he has not said he'd change and has been apart of US policy making for decades. But if Khalidi believes it why not you right?
No...I don't like practice..or at least I don't like to talk about practice.
You confuse practice with the game.
Practice is when AI doesn't turn up..
Game is when AI drops 55 after being out all night and having pancakes at 8 o'clock in the morning.
You should practice though, otherwise you just get sloppy.
Man I need to take a nap...I'm tired...day and night's mixed up...which reminds me...
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K43G4KcqYu0"]YouTube - Jim Jones Day and Night (remix)[/ame]