December 30th News (Perhaps black Wednesday)

eshghi

News Team
Oct 18, 2002
8,302
0
San Diego, CA
I'm sorry about this next few comments, but this bitch must really hate Iran and Iranians. If you can't be helpful, just shut the ^%$$% up. Chand saaleh faghat roo oon kooneh gondash neshesteh, halaa mikhaad begeh hame kauro mau daareem mikoneem. Zanike khaene, mozdoore avazi:

MKO admits involvement in Iran's protests

Wed, 30 Dec 2009

Leader of the Mujahedin-e-Khalq Organization Maryam Rajavi
The Mujahedin-e-Khalq Organization (MKO) has acknowledged that it played a role in Sunday's violent anti-government protests in Iran. MKO followers cooperated with the demonstrators and coordinated the protests
I hope the significance of this announcement is not lost on everyone.

doostAn, remember what I wrote yesterday in regards to my concerns about the radicalization of the movement and violence?

"I hope that our people are mature enough to avoid and lessen violence as much as possible because more of it will mostly benefit those who have both the means and the will to become more violent"

Here you go. Here is one group that has the means and the will to become more violent. In fact, a violent movement is the only one in which they thrive or may find a way back to power. I thought the regime itself may have staged some of those events. If not, MKO was my second guess. I guess some of my friends now can realize my concerns about the movement being set back. MKO's involvement (with an outright confession, too) is just what the doctor ordered for the regime.The whole movement can now easily be rejected as a radical terrorist MKO sympathizing movement, and they have Mrayam khanoom's self-congratulatory self-serving announcement to back up their claims too. Believe me, a lot of people are going to be very hesitant joining future protests from this point on. Fucking bastard MKO! Once again, they have back-stabbed our people.
 
Jun 9, 2004
13,753
1
Canada
You really think they have the means though Amir jaan? They've been disarmed for a long time and I honestly doubt they have any support inside Iran, let alone a broad based one. If they did, the last thing Rajavi would have done is something this stupid IMHO, as it has given the regime an open invitation to completely uproot them, not to mention that they could once again be labeled a terrorist organization by Western countries. I honestly consider the MKO a DEAD organization. She's just trying to say we're still here and signed the execution certificate of a few poor innocent people who've been arrested in the process. If the MKO had any future in Iran, she just killed it. Even in a full democratic system, she'd be wanted for treason. No one really listens to this dumb biatch - pardon my French - she just hasn't clued in yet. If they had any active role in the protests, the last thing they would have done is announce it publicly!
 
I hope the significance of this announcement is not lost on everyone.

doostAn, remember what I wrote yesterday in regards to my concerns about the radicalization of the movement and violence?

"I hope that our people are mature enough to avoid and lessen violence as much as possible because more of it will mostly benefit those who have both the means and the will to become more violent"

Here you go. Here is one group that has the means and the will to become more violent. In fact, a violent movement is the only one in which they thrive or may find a way back to power. I thought the regime itself may have staged some of those events. If not, MKO was my second guess. I guess some of my friends now can realize my concerns about the movement being set back. MKO's involvement (with an outright confession, too) is just what the doctor ordered for the regime.The whole movement can now easily be rejected as a radical terrorist MKO sympathizing movement, and they have Mrayam khanoom's self-congratulatory self-serving announcement to back up their claims too. Believe me, a lot of people are going to be very hesitant joining future protests from this point on. Fucking bastard MKO! Once again, they have back-stabbed our people.
You're reading too much into this Amirjan. Fortunately for us, the movement is way way way past the point of no-return and such idiotic statements by Maryam Tapaleh are as significant as Khamenei's call for people to accept the election results.

Not a single soul in Iran is going to think twice about joining the protests because of what Maryam Rajavi says. These poor bastards are just trying to say "Ma ham hastim". They are a few thousand among 50-60 million. The majority of their Ashraf residents are far less radical than the public believes and dying to get a chance to live in Iran again. They have no future in Iran's political forecast and they fully know it.

In any case, violence is inevitable. This movement will pay for its victory with lots of blood and that's a sad reality we will need to acknowledge at some point.
 
Oct 18, 2002
6,139
0
Los Angeles, CA USA
This is why we need a real leader. A leader to say, please dont try and hijack our movement. To say that while we appreciate you standing with us, this is our movement, our struggle, and this is what our goals and ideologies are. We are the Iranian people, not MKO and not something born outside the borders of Iran. We are the children and the citizens of this great land, and all our welcome to join us, but not steer us away from our goal of a free Iran.
 
Feb 7, 2004
13,568
0
I wouldn’t worry about MKO statement. They have no popular base and also we shouldn’t underestimate the maturity and intelligence of our people.
 
Feb 7, 2004
13,568
0
چهارشنبه، ۹ دی ۱۳۸۸
مراسم امروز یک خودزنی آشکار بود


از 22 خرداد تا کنون، حکومتی که همواره به حمایت مردمی خود پُز می داده، دچار آب رفتگی شده و سرانجام پس از 6 ماه حتی نمی تواند جمعیتی قابل توجه را برای نمایش خود جمع کند. اگر واقعاً در روز عاشورا به دستجات عزاداری توهین شده و قرآن را به آتش کشیده اند و همه مقامات حکومتی بخاطر این موضوع یقه خود را در برابر دوربین جر داده و نماینگان مجلسش راهپیمائی درون سازمانی کرده اند و ائمه جمعه اش با فریاد وااسلاما اشگ تمساح ریخته اند، واقعاً همین تعداد از مردم از این فجایع برافروخته و عصبانی شده اند؟ آیا بهتر نبود این مراسم را که اساساً یک آبروریزی تمام عیار بود اصلاً برگزار نمی کردند؟
حکومت با این عمل نسنجیده و احمقانه خود به کشورهای منطقه و به مردم دنیا اعلام می کند که چنانچه قرآن هم بآتش کشیده شود نمی تواند حتی میدان آزادی تهران را از جمعیت پُر کند. تلاش آموزش پرورش برای اجبار دانش آموزان برای شرکت در مراسم و بخشنامه های قاظعانه دولت در وزارتخانه ها و ادارات هم چندان کمک کننده نبوده است.
می دانید که اگر در کشور اسلامی دیگری نظیر پاکستان یا مصر، قرآن واقعاً بآتش کشیده شده و به آن توهین شود، چندین میلیون نفر بدون اتوبوس و بخشنامه به خیابانها خواهند ریخت؟ آیا تظاهرات میلیونی مسلمانان در اعتراض به کاریکاتور پیامبر را از یاد برده اید؟ یکبار دیگر ویدئوهای آن تظاهرات مردمی در کشورهای منطقه را ببینید و از تجمع کوچک امروز خود خجالت بکشید.
اینکه مردم تهران در اعتراض به تقلب در انتخابات از میدان امام حسین تا میدان آزادی را با حضور میلیونی خود پُر کردند ولی در عزای توهین به قرآن و مقدسات فقط میدان انقلاب و حوالی آن پُر شده است چه معنی می تواند داشته باشد؟ آیا مردم ارادت خود به مقدسات و قرآن را از دست داده اند یا دیگر دروغهای حکومت و پروپاگاندای آنرا قبول ندارند؟
برخی دوستان بیاری تکنولوژی و ابزار محاسباتی مدرن، جمعیت امروز را فقط بیست هزار نفر برآورد کرده اند، چنانچه حتی جمعیت را ساده لوحانه 10 برابر آن فرض کنیم و بگوئیم 200 هزار نفر بوده اند، باز هم بزرگترین توهین به قرآن و مقدسات است. در حقیقت این خود حکومت است که قرآن و مقدسات را زیر پایش له می کند تا بتواند به مقاصد خود برسد.
مردم عادی پیشکش، حتی اگر فقط پرسنل نیروهای مسلح و خانواده های آنها و جمعیت حقوق بگیر دولت در تهران را در نظر بگیریم بالغ بر یک میلیون نفر می شوند، آیا حکومت به چنین درجه ای از سقوط نزد افکار عمومی رسیده است که حتی مواجب بگیرها و نظامیان تحت امر خودش را هم نمی تواند وادار به شرکت در این نمایش نماید.
صدای گوش خراش بلندگوها و معلق زدنهای صدا و سیما ارزشی ندارند، میزان محبوبیت حکومت، تعداد مردمی است که داوطلبانه در مراسم حاضر شده اند. مراسم امروز بجز تأئید اعتراضات مردم به متقلب بودن و کودتایی بودن حکومت چه می تواند باشد؟
نمایش شکست خورده امروز گواه دیگری بر حقانیت جنبش سبز و مردمی بودن آن و اکثریت داشتن اعتراضات است. این هدیه حکومت، بهترین دلگرمی برای ما بود تا به راهی که در آن هستیم ایمان بیشتری یافته و گامهای بعدی را محکم تر برداریم.

http://sohrabestann.blogspot.com/2009/12/blog-post_3664.html
 
Feb 7, 2004
13,568
0
اختصاصی جرس / سومین حمله به دفتر آیت الله صانعی در قم


جنبش راه سبز (جرس): دیروز پس از راهپیمایی حامیان رهبر جمهوری اسلامی در قم ، افراد لباس شخصی ، مقابل دفتر آیت الله صانعی تجمع کرده و اقدام به شکستن شیشه ها و تخریب تابلو دفتر این روحانی بلند پایه با شعار "این همه لشکر آمده برای رهبر آمده" کردند.

به گزارش خبرنگار جرس نیروی انتظامی در محل حضور داشت و هیچ گونه اقدامی در جهت جلوگیری از اعمال خلاف قانون و خرابکارانه این گروه به عمل نیاورد.

دیروز همچنین در استان یزد نیز ،دفتر این مرجع تقلید مورد هجوم عده ای سازمان یافته قرار گرفت و این افراد اقدام به شکستن شیشه های آن مکان نمودند.
 
Feb 7, 2004
13,568
0
همین حالا اگر علی پروین در تهران سوت بزند، صد هزار تا آدم جمع می شوند، چطوری است که دولت 63 درصد رای دارد ولی تعداد حامیان دولت، از رای مهدی کوچک زاده که دویست هزار تا رای در تهران آورد کمتر است؟ یادتان نرود که در همین شهر تهران، رضا خاتمی بیش از سه میلیون رای آورد، یعنی شصت برابر جمعیت حامیان دولت کنونی.


ابراهیم نبوی​


http://www.rahesabz.net/story/6759/
 
پیامی که در ایران دهان به دهان میچرخد: وعده ما فردا پنجشنبه 10 دی ساعت 15 در همان مسيرها و خيابانهای قيام عاشورای تهران و شهرستانها ، با ياد و نام بیش از 38 شهید در عاشورا 1388 و با شعارهای: مرگ بر خامنه ای، ابوالفضل علمدار خامنه ای رو بردار
 

Zob Ahan

Elite Member
Feb 4, 2005
17,481
2,233
Iranian Dissident: ‘Please Help Us Make Our Democracy’

Green Movement Member Describes Disappointment in Obama

By Spencer Ackerman 12/30/09 4:54 PM
A scene from the Ashura protests in Iran (still from video provided by Mr. A)

Since the June 12 presidential election in Tehran unleashed a long-simmering explosion of popular discontent, the collection of organic protests known as the Green Movement has upended Iranian politics. Western governments, however, have expressed only minimal solidarity with the Green Movement, opting to focus on resolving longstanding concerns about Iran’s opaque nuclear program.
The Obama administration is no exception. But as the Iranian regime has rebuffed President Obama’s diplomatic outreach for the past year, the administration is starting to push for international sanctions targeting the regime’s most hardline elements, such as the powerful Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, a highly ideological faction of the military. And Obama has grown increasingly comfortable denouncing the regime’s human rights abuses and signaling support for the Greens. “What’s taking place within Iran is not about the United States or any other country — it’s about the Iranian people and their aspirations for justice and a better life for themselves,” Obama said on Monday, “and the decision of Iran’s leaders to govern through fear and tyranny will not succeed in making those aspirations go away.”
But it has become difficult to hear from the Iranian dissidents directly. After the Green Movement used both traditional media and social networking tools like Twitter and Facebook to document its unrest in June, the regime cracked down, evicting foreign journalists and severely restricting popular websites and internet access. Its mass arrests, with documented torture occurring in its prisons, have attempted to break the will of the Greens. Much of what the world has seen and heard from the Green Movement since the summer has been second-hand, coming from occasional journalistic reports inside the country and Iranians living abroad. Still, mass protests erupted this weekend during the religious holiday of Ashura, leading to a severe crackdown by the security services in which at least eight people were killed — including the nephew of prominent Green politician Mir-Hossein Mousavi, whose alleged loss to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in June’s fraud-filled election provided the spark for the movement.
Despite the restrictions, an Iranian dissident in Tehran who participated in these protests reached out to The Washington Independent — at significant personal risk — through a trusted third party after the Ashura crackdown began. Using a few technological processesto evade the regime’s communications restrictions, it was ultimately possible to interview this dissident, who will be referred to as Mr. A to protect his identity. Mr. A also provided two rather graphic videos of the December 27 Ashura protests in Tehran. In the interview, Mr. A, an engineering student, discusses the Green Movement’s revolutionary aspirations; its disappointment with President Obama and its lingering hope in the international community; its plans for the future; and what it wishes to see from the outside world.
Given the limited flow of information leaving Iran, TWI decided to present this interview as a lightly edited Q-&-A.

Spencer Ackerman:
Tell me what you’ve been seeing on the ground in Tehran for the last several days since Ashura. What does the outside world need to know about what’s happening?
Mr. A: To us, it all started a few days before the election. A few months ago, people found hope and the Green Movement started. We were allowed to be on street, to talk about our ideals. Nobody stopped us. And then on the election day, mobile phones were cut off. No [text messaging]. And then Ahmadinejad was announced to have won the election. We were shocked. We went to the streets again. Three million people went into the streets on a silent demonstration.
[Then, months later] people were prepared for [the religious holidays of] Tasuaa and Ashura on Saturday and Sunday. On Saturday, militia attacked Khomeini’s house [a reference to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic] where Mr. Khatami [the former president and Green supporter] was talking. They wanted to show that they are prepared for the next day. Even that night, the streets around Khomeini’s house were full of people.
But the real thing started on Ashura. I was in College Crossing [a landmark in Tehran]. The Greens were supposed to start from Imam Hossein Square and go to Azadi Square on that day. College Crossing is a place in between. Like always, the Basij [a pro-regime militia] and the police used tear gas on us.

Ackerman: How many people were out in the streets for Ashura?

Mr. A: I am an engineer, and I can’t say anything without proof, so honestly, I don’t know. But we were a lot, we outnumbered them. That’s why they couldn’t beat us like always. They were using guns. Not a lot, but I heard gunshots. A block away [from me], a few people were killed by gunshots. You can see the video in which a police car is driving over people.

Mr. A: The police have large vans to [detain] people. We stopped one of them. There were five police with guns, plus several [other officers]. They did not dare to start firing, but they held still [instead]. We managed to break the van’s windows and free the people inside. Like I said, we outnumbered them. I saw some police forces who declined to [issuing orders to] their officers to do anything against people.

Ackerman: Was that planned? Or did you and several other dissidents just decide to do it when you saw the van?

Mr. A: Nothing was planned. There was a route for buses, and they used this route to transport [detained protesters]. We set fire to large trash cans and put them on the route so they couldnt easily pass the route.

Ackerman: Right now there is a report saying that the Iranian police are vowing “no mercy” to protesters. But you saw police chiefs tell their men not to harm you?
Mr. A: Police chiefs ordered their men, but their men refused. Not always, though.

Ackerman: Would you say you’re starting to see members of the police express sympathy with the Greens? Or is that going too far?

Mr. A: Exactly. People surrounded some of them, at least 20 [people], and [the police] were asking for mercy. “Don’t kill us,” they were shouting.
Ackerman: Were you afraid the Greens were going to harm the police?
Mr. A: Some people wanted to throw stones at them. Stones were the only thing we had. But some other people prevented them from doing that. They put themselves between police and angry people so the angry people didn’t throw stones at police. We also managed to capture several Basiji [militiamen]. Some were hurt. But some were released and given water to drink.

Ackerman: What was it like, to interact with the Basij? How did they respond to you when you captured them but didnt abuse them? Did you try to talk with them, reason with them?

Mr. A: They are brainwashed. Personally, they are not bad people at all. But when they feel that you cross their red lines, they become something else. Like an animal. They think we are moshrek [polythiests] or kafar [athiests]. In Islam, you can kill kafar.

Ackerman: Do they acknowledge any of your points? Or is it useless to reason with them?

Mr. A: Absolutely useless.
Ackerman: Do they at least acknowledge that you’re not beating them up? How do they react when you show them your humanity?
Mr. A: Some of them didn’t say anything. Personally, I thought they were thinking on another attack! But some of them were impressed. You know, in Iran, Khamanei thinks of himself as God. So do most Basijis. So when you insult Khamanei, you give them enough motivation to beat you.
Ackerman: What will it take to get the police to support the Greens?
Mr. A: That’s our hope for [the] next phase [of demonstrations].

Ackerman: Tell me about the next phase. What should we expect?

Mr. A: We know that the police chiefs are mostly corrupted. [The next phase] depends heavily on the fact that if they decide to arrest Mr. Mousavi or Karroubi or Khatami, there will be very severe connsequences. People will come to the streets again. (I heard today from Netherlands’ radio that Khamanei’s jet was prepared to move him to Russia.) So it is a risk that they haven’t taken yet.

Ackerman: What do you hear from the typical person in Tehran who isn’t part of the Green movement? What are they saying about all of this, about Ahmadinejad, about what they want for the future?

Mr. A: Currently, we have two types of people. One who supports Ahmadinejad. [They are] mostly hardliners and also government officials. [And then there are] ordinary people who are against him. They might not participate in demonstrations, but they are supportive (at least in words) when you talk to them. And now, it is not about Ahmadinejad [any longer]. It is about Khamanei himself and the regime. That’s what gives poeple motivation to support the Green movement.

Ackerman: What do you think it will take to get the average regime supporter — the government workers, etc — to back the Greens?

Mr. A: It is a matter of time. Day by day, people join this movement. When they see their relatives were beaten or even killed, they get to know that this regime is [at] its end.
Something interesting here is that we don’t have a leader.
Ackerman: So we in the outside world shouldn’t say Kerroubi or Mousavi or Khatami are Green “leaders”?
Mr. A: No. Mr. Mousavi in his statements, always says that [the] people are the real leaders of the Green movement. He never said to come to streets on Ashura or Qods or any other days, although he is smart enough to just point that there are many days that people can come to the streets like Ashura, etc.
Ackerman: My last few questions are about the outside world. What do you want from the U.S.? What are you looking to see? Some are saying that the U.S. & its allies could place sanctions on the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps; others are afraid that even those sanctions would hurt the Iranian people. What do you think?
Mr. A: It is a hard question. We are amazed by Obama’s actions. He talks of democracy, yet he sends a letter to Khamanei and wants to talk to this government.

Ackerman: So you’re disappointed by Obama’s actions?

Mr. A: Up to now, yes. But we hope that like 1978, when the democrats took power [in Iran after the fall of the Shah], the revolution succeeded. This time, it [will] happen again by persuading Russia and China not to support this regime. They still feel they will control the situation, but when Russia and China turns agains them, they’re going to think of backing off a little

Ackerman: What do you think about sanctions? My sources in the Obama administration say that they’re not having any luck talking to Iran and so now are trying to get the international community, including the United Nations, to support sanctions, particularly sanctions targeting the IRGC?

Mr. A: It is a very good move, provided that the people [aren't] affected very much by these sanctions. It’s already hard for us to send and receive packages lately, for instance. Another thing is that there have been so many arrests. Civil rights are the last thing [the regime] cares about. So besides sanctions, we need international pressures to prevent numerous arrests everyday.
Ackerman: Last question. What’s the most important message you want the outside world to know about the Green movement? Or about Iran and the regime?
Mr. A: Please help us make our democracy.

Ackerman: What do we need to do?

Mr. A: Spread the word, so your governments don’t negotiate any deal with this regime.
 

k-EYVON

Bench Warmer
Oct 20, 2003
1,785
0
BT
i agree Behnud pushing it here to create a unique style but it really lacks
the bones and content. He uses a bunch of hints and refrences but to write
in such manner one has to be a real effective writer first which he is not.

I remember one of my teachers once offering critic to a piece I had written
in Persian saying that in order to change reality one has to know that reality well
beyond all doubt. He meant that I had yet to master the foundation of writing
prose to write a piece that defied normalcy and employed poetics and other
different short cuts to content.
 
Apr 10, 2003
2,705
0
No class tomoroow, Silence protest in Mashhad Azad Uni on Thursday,Dec31


GENEVA (Reuters) - United Nations Human Rights chief Navi Pillay on Wednesday called on the Tehran government to curb excess use of force by its security services and expressed shock over violence in Iran over the past few days.

Pillay's comments came as Iran's police chief warned that anti-government protesters could expect harsh treatment if they took part in further banned rallies.

"People have a right to express their feelings and to hold peaceful protests without being beaten, clubbed and thrown into jail," Pillay said in a statement issued from her Geneva office.

"I am shocked by the upsurge in deaths, injuries and arrests. The government has a duty to ensure that the violence does not escalate," the statement said.

While noting that it was not yet clear how eight people died when protests were suppressed in Iran last Sunday, she said information available "suggests excessive acts of violence by security forces and the para-military Basij militia".

She reminded Tehran that it was a signatory to the U.N.'s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which bars arbitrary arrest and declares that the right to freedom of expression and peaceful gatherings are universal.

High Commissioner for Human Rights since 2008, Pillay has shown mounting readiness to speak out against what she sees as abuses in U.N. developing country members who are generally shielded from criticism in the 47-nation Human Rights Council.

Pillay, formerly defence attorney for opponents of apartheid in South Africa and more recently a judge at the International Criminal Court at The Hague, also voiced alarm at arrests of opposition activists, journalists and human rights defenders.

(Editing by Louise Ireland)