Pahlevoon jaan, that was just a lighthearted comment. The cynicism is yours on this account.
It is not sufficient to just have a complaint? You must have a solution for something better. If you do not, as I pointed out earlier, you will be taken advantage by people for ends that are not just unrelated to your complaint but are often to the detriment of your interest in the very complaint you have. Time and again, when a politician wants to get elected to do what he wants to do, he repeats and appeals to the complaints people have. How many times are you going to fall for the same thing. It is all about what solution you have for something better.
I absolutely believe the US financial industry has been receiving government welfare in the form of laws and regulations that give it windfall profits. The situation has gotten much worse since the late 90s and accelerated under Bush. This is greatly damaging the interests of Americans. The damage is even greater than that inflicted by the military industrial complex. The only other special interest group that rivals the damage the financial sector is inflicting on the US is the healthcare providers and industry (insurance, pharma, and dentists, doctors, nurses, pharmacist, trial lawyers unions.) I am delighted that people are taking some action. I am not however optimistic about the outcome without a better alternative solution.
The real question is how are you going to change, what are you going to change?
You say it is about accountability, ok, what exactly do you have in mind? In what way people in the financial industry are less accountable and what needs to change?
Merriam-Webster.com defines a cynic as one who is a “faultfinding, captious critic.” Certainly, in the way you approached this whole thread – by first declaring that the movement “if not already will very soon loose its actual mission and become some zealous religious mission for someone else's interests that will actually hurt the interests of those protesting” and then turning sarcastically denigrating by suggesting that those supporting the protests were “virtual occupiers of WS.” Both of these are direct quotes form your two previous posts.
Regardless of who’s espousing cynicism, let’s be clear about one thing. As should be obvious, I am neither an organizer nor a participant in these protests. What I am is a supporter. Now, I can tell you the “why” of my support, but it will most certainly not be the only thing on the minds of the folks gathering in New York (and now, Boston, and Los Angeles, and Chicago, and San Francisco, and…)
Much like many of the people gathered in WS, I have a laundry list of complaints.
One is to which you’ve already alluded: the coddling of the bankers by the laws of these United States. And, this is not limited to just the bankers, but rather to the entire spectrum of very wealthy in this country. What to do about it, you ask? If up to me, I’d bring back the tax rates of, not the Clinton era, but that of Reagan! Those astute (and old) enough, remember that Reagan’s tax changes of the eighties actually RAISED taxes on the richest folks. This was later dropped during Clinton and then again during Bush Jr.
Another thing I would do would be to bring back the Glass-Steagle act of 1932 that was actually repealed at the end of Clinton presidency. That one act alone could have – indeed would have – saved pretty much the entire globe from the disaster we’re now facing.
One more action I would greatly support would be to put an immediate end to Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns, along with all the sordid, corrupt no-bid contracts and thievery, courtesy of our tax dollars.
Now, that is my laundry list. Whereas I’m sure these are included in the list of demands of those actually on the ground, I’m also positive that other demands might include sitting around campfires and smoking weed or singing “we are the world.”
As the history of these very same United States shows, there’s always change when there’s a spontaneous movement that is not hoarded by some ideologue over another. As our own Iranian history shows, I agree with you that the opposite is also possible where some religious, right-wing nutcase takes over the movement. However, based on the fact that history is on the side of Americans (as evidenced by the civil rights and anti-war movements of the 1960’s) as well as the fact that we already have enough religious loony groups operating in this country (as in the Tea Party), I prefer to see this as positive event rather than denigrate it and therefore, perhaps unintentionally, give credence to those who wish things to remain the same, or worse, become one nation under Tea Bags!