BREAKING: Margaret Thatcher dead at age 87

Flint

Legionnaire
Jan 28, 2006
7,016
0
United States
#61
Copying and pasting this from a Facebook user who was commenting on a status earlier this week - a bit more to ponder about Thatcher (whether you agree or disagree with the following policies)...

1. She supported the retention of capital punishment
2. She destroyed the country's manufacturing industry
3. She voted against the relaxation of divorce laws
4. She abolished free milk for schoolchildren ("Margaret Thatcher, Milk Snatcher")
5. She supported more freedom for business (and look how that turned out)
6. She gained support from the National Front in the 1979 election by pandering to the fears of immigration
7. She gerrymandered local authorities by forcing through council house sales, at the same time preventing councils from spending the money they got for selling houses on building new houses (spending on social housing dropped by 67% in her premiership)
8. She was responsible for 3.6 million unemployed - the highest figure and the highest proportion of the workforce in history and three times the previous government. Massaging of the figures means that the figure was closer to 5 million
9. She ignored intelligence about Argentinian preparations for the invasion of the Falkland Islands and scrapped the only Royal Navy presence in the islands
10. The poll tax
11. She presided over the closure of 150 coal mines; we are now crippled by the cost of energy, having to import expensive coal from abroad
12. She compared her "fight" against the miners to the Falklands War
13. She privatised state monopolies and created the corporate greed culture that we've been railing against for the last 5 years
14. She introduced the gradual privatisation of the NHS
15. She introduced financial deregulation in a way that turned city institutions into avaricious money pits
16. She pioneered the unfailing adoration and unquestioning support of the USA
17. She allowed the US to place nuclear missiles on UK soil, under US control
18. Section 28
19. She opposed anti-apartheid sanctions against South Africa and described Nelson Mandela as "that grubby little terrorist"
20. She support the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and sent the SAS to train their soldiers
21. She allowed the US to bomb Libya in 1986, against the wishes of more than 2/3 of the population
22. She opposed the reunification of Germany
23. She invented Quangos
24. She increased VAT from 8% to 17.5%
25. She had the lowest approval rating of any post-war Prime Minister
26. Her post-PM job? Consultant to Philip Morris tobacco at $250,000 a year, plus $50,000 per speech
27. The Al Yamamah contract
28. She opposed the indictment of Chile's General Pinochet
29. Social unrest under her leadership was higher than at any time since the General Strike
30. She presided over interest rates increasing to 15%
31. BSE
32. She presided over 2 million manufacturing job losses in the 79-81 recession
33. She opposed the inclusion of Eire in the Northern Ireland peace process
34. She supported sanctions-busting arms deals with South Africa
35. Cecil Parkinson, Alan Clark, David Mellor, Jeffrey Archer, Jonathan Aitkin
36. Crime rates doubled under Thatcher
37. Black Wednesday – Britain withdraws from the ERM and the pound is devalued. Cost to Britain - £3.5 billion; profit for George Soros - £1 billion
38. Poverty doubled while she opposed a minimum wage
39. She privatised public services, claiming at the time it would increase public ownership. Most are now owned either by foreign governments (EDF) or major investment houses. The profits don’t now accrue to the taxpayer, but to foreign or institutional shareholders.
40. She cut 75% of funding to museums, galleries and other sources of education
41. In the Thatcher years the top 10% of earners received almost 50% of the tax remissions
42. 21.9% inflation
43. She saved Britain.
 

Silverton

National Team Player
Nov 6, 2004
4,524
6
#62
When I was studying international relations, her and Reagan were heavily involved in pushing neo-Liberalism and standardizing it - which is such a usurious and disastrous system that increases the gap between rich and poor (people and countries).
 

Flint

Legionnaire
Jan 28, 2006
7,016
0
United States
#63
The gap again? Could you please stop fretting over what your neighbor has and just go out and make money for yourself? Do you drive your kids around the block pointing to big homes and saying they need to get kicked out, or do you say he too can buy one of them someday?
 

Behrooz_C

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2005
16,651
1,566
A small island west of Africa
#64
You are a puzzle to me -
when it comes to British politics you are a conservative - yet when it gets to USA, you suddenly become an Obama fan!!! what gives?
That's because the US type of Tea Party ultra conservatism is very different to the European conservatism. They just take it too far. I can not agree with free gun ownership and am an advocate of state provision for healthcare. Anyway, US Democrats are more conservative than the UK Conservatives any day.
 

Behrooz_C

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2005
16,651
1,566
A small island west of Africa
#65
As regarding Thatcher again, she has been wrongly caricatured by the left while ignoring all the good that came out of her policies. No one argues that some of her policies incurred hardship on many people but the changes were necessary. Any other candidate who won the elections in 79 would have had to change the system. Inflation was 18%, basic income tax was 40% to pay for loss-making industries. Union leaders like Arthur Scargill ran amok, even threatened with violence, and there were strikes and disruptions every other week. They demanded higher wages for loss-making national industries that the tax payer had to subsidise. By 1988 inflation was brought down to 2% and the unions were dismantled.

People say Thatcher divided the nation, but they forget that the country was divided in the 70s anyway. That's why there were so many strikes, demonstrations, etc. When people talk of Thatcher's era, they forget the era just before that.

At the end of the day, she won 3 elections. She won majority votes in all of them which should tell you everything you need to know: the majority of people agreed with the changes she was making.

As for not having any women in the cabinet, it's true. But those who knew her from a young age will tell you that she was extremely competitive and stubborn and she always desired to be "the one". She didn't want just any post in the cabinet. She wanted to be either the Chancellor or the Prime Minister. What she did to rise through the ranks of so many old Tories is nothing short of remarkable. Not many women can control a herd of males and order them about like she did for 11 years.
 

Chinaski

Elite Member
Jun 14, 2005
12,269
352
#66
The gap again? Could you please stop fretting over what your neighbor has and just go out and make money for yourself? Do you drive your kids around the block pointing to big homes and saying they need to get kicked out, or do you say he too can buy one of them someday?
Really this moron is still trying to make it look as if every one who does not agree with his stupid boundless and lawless kind of neocon capitalism is about to die of hunger. What a clown. As i said i am pretty sure i earn more money than this guy and i studied, attended university and have a degree. Im not the kind of farsh foroosh o baaghaali foroosh like this bunch oonvaght in joojeh oomade mige berid pool dar aarid :)
 
Jun 9, 2004
13,753
1
Canada
#67
The gap again? Could you please stop fretting over what your neighbor has and just go out and make money for yourself? Do you drive your kids around the block pointing to big homes and saying they need to get kicked out, or do you say he too can buy one of them someday?
Actually, Bill Maher brought this question up in one his shows, when he was talking about Romney and Republicans a few months back and I found what he said VERY interesting. The answer is actually neither! Most people don't really care to live in mansions or have a yacht in the Caribbean or have servers at their beck and call 24 hours a day - they simply do not want that lifestyle. They just want to have a comfortable peaceful life where they don't worry about where their next mortgage payment comes from or whether they're going to have enough money to pay for their kids college in 10 years or how they're going to support themselves when they retire.

So, as much as you don't support the system that should be centered around the poor (which you always call socialism), many people don't support the system that's completely centered around the super rich - particularly when that comes at the expense of the middle class. And frankly, I don't understand why anyone on ISP would argue on behalf of the super rich, because I don't think any of us fall into that category. The majority of the people here are in the middle class, although some may be toward the lower end and some toward the upper end and regardless of which end of the category we fall in, policies that focus on either end of the poor-rich spectrum always hurt the middle class the most.
 
#68
The only people that Thatcher pleased were the people of South East England - ever since, they've been the privileged. Everywhere else in the UK, she seemed to have scarred. I'm torn whether I appreciate her, or that I despise her. I feel she should have a private funeral service rather than a public one which is set to cost £10m. I've been told by friends that there have been mass-protests organised on Wednesday in London - hoping and praying that they won't turn to riots. Regardless, the Conservative Party know how to make people angry!
 

Flint

Legionnaire
Jan 28, 2006
7,016
0
United States
#69
Yeah, and now that she's gone why don't you bring back British Leyland and the wonderful Rovers they built. While you are at it, why not bring back BOAC too, all under government ownership of course, the way they meant to be. And you know who invented intermittent wipers, don't you?
 
Oct 18, 2010
6,271
849
#71
i was a party with a lot of british expats last night.i asked one how he felt about thatcher's death and he replied "how did iraqis feel about saddam's death?".he said she was the reason he left the uk and came over to the states back in the 80s.some older guys were remembering with fondness the young british girls who came over as nannies to the states when she took over the uk as very "friendly" and eager to have fun.
"ding dong the witch is dead" is making to the top of the charts and in england and scotland people are having parties.

[video=youtube_share;_dozWyGMh8o]http://youtu.be/_dozWyGMh8o[/video]
 

Behrooz_C

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2005
16,651
1,566
A small island west of Africa
#74
i was a party with a lot of british expats last night.i asked one how he felt about thatcher's death and he replied "how did iraqis feel about saddam's death?".he said she was the reason he left the uk and came over to the states back in the 80s.some older guys were remembering with fondness the young british girls who came over as nannies to the states when she took over the uk as very "friendly" and eager to have fun.
"ding dong the witch is dead" is making to the top of the charts and in england and scotland people are having parties.
You need to stop socialising with morons like that. I mean, comparing Thatcher to Saddam should tell you their level of intelligence, and probably your own too!

People hate so much that they become the thing they hate. In this case it's also out of complete ignorance. I heard one of these party goers at the weekend, this airheaded bitch who couldn't even speak English properly. Her reason for hating Thatcher was: "she spent like ...a lot of money on the government and capitalism an' stuff...." It cracked me up but also made me realise this is exactly the level of education and intelligence you expect from these people.
 

Flint

Legionnaire
Jan 28, 2006
7,016
0
United States
#75
she was the reason he left the uk and came over to the states back in the 80s.
So he fled Thathcer's Britain to come to Reagan's America? What idiots do you hang out with? And weren't you the one who denied it when I said stop celebrating on the grave of the dead and here you are posting "celebrations" videos all over. Thanks for reminding me why I am not with the commies on anything.

PS

Oh, and Hassan Kachal liked your post. Another feather in your cap.
 

Chinaski

Elite Member
Jun 14, 2005
12,269
352
#76
lol if i had to decide about who is the bigger moron and clown, i am not sure i would take anyone ahead of you. Oonvaght in nokhodi oomadeh dar morede digaroon ghezaavat mikone. bebinam moron, show me one commie here and then we talk about communism. Nemitooni moron, nemitooni chon mokhesho nadaari, kheyli koochiki. These guys you are talking about are not commies, they are moslems. There is no commie hier, if we would go with your fucked up logics every one slightly left of US Neocons is a communist. Naadaan :)
 
Aug 26, 2005
16,771
4
#77
It is no wonder that people who oppose her are among the economically illiterate. The country was in a complete mess before she took office, there was one telecom provider which failed half the time, one national electricity provider with regular black outs and there was water shortage among many other failing national industries. On top of this, the tax rate was sky high in order to pay for all this. What she did was to privatise the industries and close down the ones that were maintained by the tax payer. Sure this was painful to many but from an economic point of view it made perfect sense.

Yes the gap between the rich and the poor became wider due to her policies but who cares about the gap? As long as the poor are richer, why does it matter if the rich are much richer? What matters is that all levels of income have risen and the poor have much better standard of living than in the 70s. That's what matters.

Anyway, let's judge her legacy in 30 years from now and let's history decide that because some emotions are too high for any sensible judgment to be made.
I haven't looked at her record in great detail but I know Thatcher was deeply influenced by Friedman and Hayek. I'm surprised then to see you agree with her moves. Kudos to you Behrooz jan for being pragmatic and not ideologically immovable.
 

Zob Ahan

Elite Member
Feb 4, 2005
17,481
2,233
#78
i was a party with a lot of british expats last night.i asked one how he felt about thatcher's death and he replied "how did iraqis feel about saddam's death?".he said she was the reason he left the uk and came over to the states back in the 80s.some older guys were remembering with fondness the young british girls who came over as nannies to the states when she took over the uk as very "friendly" and eager to have fun.
"ding dong the witch is dead" is making to the top of the charts and in england and scotland people are having parties.

[video=youtube_share;_dozWyGMh8o]http://youtu.be/_dozWyGMh8o[/video]
How was the halva?
 
Aug 26, 2005
16,771
4
#79
Actually, Bill Maher brought this question up in one his shows, when he was talking about Romney and Republicans a few months back and I found what he said VERY interesting. The answer is actually neither! Most people don't really care to live in mansions or have a yacht in the Caribbean or have servers at their beck and call 24 hours a day - they simply do not want that lifestyle. They just want to have a comfortable peaceful life where they don't worry about where their next mortgage payment comes from or whether they're going to have enough money to pay for their kids college in 10 years or how they're going to support themselves when they retire.

So, as much as you don't support the system that should be centered around the poor (which you always call socialism), many people don't support the system that's completely centered around the super rich - particularly when that comes at the expense of the middle class. And frankly, I don't understand why anyone on ISP would argue on behalf of the super rich, because I don't think any of us fall into that category. The majority of the people here are in the middle class, although some may be toward the lower end and some toward the upper end and regardless of which end of the category we fall in, policies that focus on either end of the poor-rich spectrum always hurt the middle class the most.
Because Behrou jan, the above is cognitive dissonance. No person who bases their values on conservative/libertarian economics cares directly for the rich nor is it a system [just] for the rich. It benefits the rich because they tend to be the most economically active, and that kind of system gives them even more incentive to be active. On the other hand, it also benefits anyone who takes upon themselves to show a greater level of responsibility.

I think the problem is something Behrooz touched upon: even though a lot of socialistic programs are based on good intentions or are seen as "no big deal"...they open up a pandora's box creating even more havoc. What becomes a helpful aid is now an expectation and a right. That's where a lot of misplaced anger resides and where a lot of politicians do a good job tapping up for votes.